This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
electrical:solar:charge_controller [2019/09/28 17:17] frater_secessus [MPPT] |
electrical:solar:charge_controller [2019/09/28 17:23] frater_secessus [sizing your charge controller] |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
If more power is needed (and there is physical space) additional PV can be added to match the charging output of an MPPT charger, often at a lower cost. [There are no prizes for fanciest or most expensive charge controller! | If more power is needed (and there is physical space) additional PV can be added to match the charging output of an MPPT charger, often at a lower cost. [There are no prizes for fanciest or most expensive charge controller! | ||
MPPT controllers also tend to consume more power to run themselves than PWM models due to additional processing and electronic components. | MPPT controllers also tend to consume more power to run themselves than PWM models due to additional processing and electronic components. | ||
+ | |||
**MPPT may be a better fit** when: | **MPPT may be a better fit** when: | ||
* battery banks are cycled deeply on a regular basis so more time is spent in Bulk | * battery banks are cycled deeply on a regular basis so more time is spent in Bulk | ||
Line 72: | Line 73: | ||
[[electrical: | [[electrical: | ||
===== sizing your charge controller ===== | ===== sizing your charge controller ===== | ||
- | As with [[electrical: | + | As with [[electrical: |
For PWM controllers, | For PWM controllers, | ||
MPPT controllers have more leeway in sizing since they can control the output of the panels independently of battery voltage. | MPPT controllers have more leeway in sizing since they can control the output of the panels independently of battery voltage. |