This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
electrical:solar:panel-bank_ratio [2020/06/24 21:52] frater_secessus [2:1 overpaneling] |
electrical:solar:panel-bank_ratio [2020/06/24 22:29] frater_secessus [2:1 overpaneling] |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
[[electrical: | [[electrical: | ||
- | Working backwards, | + | Working backwards, fully charging lead-chemistries |
+ | |||
Line 14: | Line 16: | ||
This slightly [[electrical: | This slightly [[electrical: | ||
- | Working backwards, successfully fully charging lead-chemisties | + | Working backwards, successfully fully charging lead-chemistries |
On average, this would work in Little Rock, San Francisco, Phoenix, Birmingham, Atlanta, New Orleans, Albuquerque, | On average, this would work in Little Rock, San Francisco, Phoenix, Birmingham, Atlanta, New Orleans, Albuquerque, | ||
Line 22: | Line 24: | ||
This significantly overpaneled configuration generally yields an excess of power, useful in rain, low winter sun, overcast conditions, etc. | This significantly overpaneled configuration generally yields an excess of power, useful in rain, low winter sun, overcast conditions, etc. | ||
' | ' | ||
+ | |||
+ | Working backwards, successfully fully charging lead-chemisties by solar means only requires about 2.83hrs of Full Sun Equivalent on MPPT, and about 3.25hrs FSE with PWM. | ||
+ | |||
+ | On average this this opens up everything but Canada and Anchorage AK. | ||
===== 1:2 underpaneling ===== | ===== 1:2 underpaneling ===== | ||
//1:2// == 100W solar + 200Ah of battery. | //1:2// == 100W solar + 200Ah of battery. |