Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- electrical:solar:panels [2018/05/19 08:05]
frater_secessus [panel voltage] 48 fix
+++ electrical:solar:panels [2018/05/19 08:12]
frater_secessus [polycrystalline]
@@ Line 23: / Line 23: @@
     * slightly better than poly in uniform low light
     * theoretically greater longevity than poly, much better longevity than thin film
-    * slightly higher Vmpp than poly((https://www.victronenergy.com/upload/documents/White-paper-Which-solar-charge-controller-PWM-or-MPPT.pdf Section 7.4))
+    * slightly higher [[electrical:12v:electrical_notation|Vmp]] than poly((https://www.victronenergy.com/upload/documents/White-paper-Which-solar-charge-controller-PWM-or-MPPT.pdf Section 7.4))
-    * slightly better performance in higher temps than poly, possibly due to higher Vmpp
+    * slightly better performance in higher temps than poly, possibly due to higher Vmp
   * CON
     * most expensive to produce
@@ Line 42: / Line 42: @@
     * least expensive PV per watt
   * CON
-    * efficiency (13%-16%) is less than mono for a given area.  This works out to 3%-5% less efficient in practice.((https://www.altestore.com/blog/2016/09/monocrystalline-polycrystalline-solar-panels/))
+    * efficiency (13%-16%) is less than mono.  This works out to 3%-5% less power for a given area.((https://www.altestore.com/blog/2016/09/monocrystalline-polycrystalline-solar-panels/))
     * slightly worse performance in high temps than mono

RV and vandwellers wiki