This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
electrical:12v:alternator_charging_rates [2023/09/10 17:13] frater_secessus |
electrical:12v:alternator_charging_rates [2023/09/10 17:25] (current) frater_secessus [estimating combiner charging] |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| - | ====== How much will by battery charge by alternator? ====== | + | ====== How much will my battery charge by alternator? ====== |
| This should be easy, right? | This should be easy, right? | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| We know the time part because we're the ones driving. | We know the time part because we're the ones driving. | ||
| - | |||
| ===== TLDR ===== | ===== TLDR ===== | ||
| Line 47: | Line 46: | ||
| - | ==== estimating DC-DC charging ==== | + | ===== estimating DC-DC charging |
| - | DC-DC charging rates are more predictable because of how they work. A 20A DC-DC will likely pump 20A into the bank most of the time. So 3 hours driving x 20A = 60Ah returned to the battery bank. The price of this predictability (and other features) is... price. | + | DC-DC charging rates are more predictable because of how they work. A 20A DC-DC will likely pump 20A into the bank most of the time. So 1/2 hour driving x 20A = 10Ah returned to the battery bank. The price of this predictability (and other features) is... price. |
| - | If you need predictable charging then DC-DC is likely the answer. | + | If you need predictable charging then DC-DC is likely the answer. There are [[electrical: |
| - | ==== estimating combiner charging ==== | + | ===== estimating combiner charging |
| This is the tough one. We know roughly where the charge rate will start out for discharged batteries (≤0.33C) but the taper complicates things. | This is the tough one. We know roughly where the charge rate will start out for discharged batteries (≤0.33C) but the taper complicates things. | ||
| Line 61: | Line 60: | ||
| * **FLA** taper is steep; | * **FLA** taper is steep; | ||
| * 100Ah x .12C = 12A. | * 100Ah x .12C = 12A. | ||
| - | * 0.5hours of driving x 15A = 6Ah replaced. | + | * 0.5hours of driving x 12A = 6Ah replaced. |
| * **AGM** taper is more gradual, so charging currrent stays higher on short drives. It might only taper to 0.15C by the end of the drive. | * **AGM** taper is more gradual, so charging currrent stays higher on short drives. It might only taper to 0.15C by the end of the drive. | ||
| * **Lithium** has an odd taper because the charging voltage curve is not linear. | * **Lithium** has an odd taper because the charging voltage curve is not linear. | ||
| * in the broad " | * in the broad " | ||
| + | ==== in the real world ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | In most installs this variability isn't a major issue: | ||
| + | * combiner charging is commonly paired with solar charging (also highly variable!) | ||
| + | * alternator charging is often a backup or "nice when you can get it" charging source. | ||