Both sides previous revision
Previous revision
Next revision
|
Previous revision
|
electrical:solar:panels [2024/05/28 16:36] frater_secessus [Portable] |
electrical:solar:panels [2025/03/13 14:07] (current) frater_secessus [efficiency] bold |
==== Portable ==== | ==== Portable ==== |
| |
While most panels are hard mounted horizontally on the roof of the van, portable folding portable solar panels have dropped in price and have some advantages. | While most panels are hard mounted horizontally on the roof of the van, portable solar panels((folding, briefcase, framed or otherwise)) may have some advantages. |
| |
[[https://www.amazon.com/portable-solar-panel/s?k=portable+solar+panel|Amazon search]] | [[https://www.amazon.com/portable-solar-panel/s?k=portable+solar+panel|Amazon search]] |
* Questions exist about long-term durability | * Questions exist about long-term durability |
* Possibility of panels getting stolen | * Possibility of panels getting stolen |
| * not all portables are weatherproof |
| * can be blown over by wind |
| |
| |
===== efficiency ===== | ===== efficiency ===== |
| |
The formula for panel efficiency is simply rated watts / square meter. A 20% efficient panel will make 200w per square meter under lab conditions (ie, 20% of the lab's 1000w standard). | The formula for panel efficiency is simply [ rated kW / square meter ]. A 20% efficient panel will make 200w per square meter under lab conditions, ie, 20% of the lab's 1000w standard. (0.20kW per square meter) |
| |
| |
Higher efficiency doesn't mean the panel makes more power; it means it makes more power from a given area. 100w is 100w, but you might be able to fit a 110w panel high-efficiency panel in the same space as a regular-efficiency panel. | Higher efficiency doesn't mean the panel makes more power; it means it makes **more power from a given area**. 100w is 100w, but you might be able to fit a 110w panel high-efficiency panel in the same space as a regular-efficiency panel. |
| |
In general, mono has higher efficiency than poly, and poly has higher efficiency than thin film. | In general, mono has higher efficiency than poly, and poly has higher efficiency than thin film. |
| |
PV are generally rated by several criteria((http://www.kg4cyx.net/solar-panel-specifications-explained/)) | PV are generally rated by several criteria((http://www.kg4cyx.net/solar-panel-specifications-explained/)) |
* **Power (W, or Pmax)**: 190 Watts. <- rated power in Watts under lab conditions. You can derive **price-per-watt** by dividing $/watts. | * **Power (W, or Pmax)**: 190 Watts. <- rated power in Watts under [[#stc_and_noct|standard testing conditions (STC)]]. You can derive **price-per-watt** by dividing $/watts. |
* **Open Circuit Voltage (Voc)**: 36.00 Voc <- Volts in full sun with no load. In practice you will likely not see Voc when hooked to the controller, but **all parts of your solar installation need to be able to cope with the theoretical Voc**. In serial arrays the Voc ratings are added. | * **Open Circuit Voltage (Voc)**: 36.00 Voc <- Volts in full sun with no load. In practice you will likely not see Voc when hooked to the controller, but **all parts of your solar installation need to be able to cope with the theoretical Voc**. In serial arrays the Voc ratings are added. Because [[https://rvwiki.mousetrap.net/doku.php?id=electrical:solar:output#solar_magnifiers|some scenarios can cause panel overvoltage]], it is common to multiply ''Voc x 1.2''((ie, 20% buffer)) to find the safe PV input limit. |
* **Short Circuit Current (Isc)**: 7.42 Isc <- Amps in full sun when shorted. Also theoretical, but **connectors and cables need to be sized to handle Isc**. | * **Short Circuit Current (Isc)**: 7.42 Isc <- Amps in full sun when shorted. Also theoretical, but **connectors and cables need to be sized to handle Isc**. |
* **Maximum Power Voltage (Vmp)**: 28.60 Vmp <- voltage at which max power is generated in lab conditions | * **Maximum Power Voltage (Vmp)**: 28.60 Vmp <- voltage at which max power is generated in lab conditions |