This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Next revision | Previous revision | ||
opinion:frater_secessus:the_case_for_agm [2020/04/13 11:50] frater_secessus created |
opinion:frater_secessus:the_case_for_agm [2021/06/08 14:52] (current) frater_secessus |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
====== the case for AGM ====== | ====== the case for AGM ====== | ||
- | There really | + | There are situations where AGM is worth spending twice as much compared to flooded lead-acid. |
+ | |||
+ | * the ‘dweller installs the battery bank in a location where it is not reachable for normal maintenance | ||
+ | * the ‘dweller needs to mount the battery on its side for some esoteric reason (or is 4×4 trekking so the RV itself can end up in weird angles) | ||
+ | * the ' | ||
+ | * the ‘dweller wants to run heavier-than-normal [[electrical: | ||
+ | * the ‘dweller has has an actual (not imagined) chemical hypersensitivity | ||
+ | * the advanced ‘dweller is running a single battery for both house and starter systems (“[[electrical: | ||
+ | * the ' | ||
+ | |||
+ | Lithium does things as well or better for lower overall cost-per-kHw, | ||
- | the ‘dweller installs the battery bank in a location where it is not reachable for normal maintenance | ||
- | the ‘dweller needs to mount the battery on its side for some esoteric reason (or is 4×4 trekking so the RV itself can end up in weird angles) | ||
- | the ‘dweller chooses to run heavier-than-normal loads like microwaves, electric coffeemakers, | ||
- | the ‘dweller has has a chemical hypersensitivity. | ||
- | the advanced ‘dweller is running a single battery for both house and starter systems (“shallow cycling”) | ||
- | fixme |