This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
opinion:more_power [2025/05/04 11:52] frater_secessus [demand problems] |
opinion:more_power [2025/05/05 12:07] (current) frater_secessus |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | >> “It is cheaper and easier to use less power than it is to make more power.” – highdesertranger | + | DRAFT |
+ | |||
+ | > “It is cheaper and easier to use less power than it is to make more power.” – highdesertranger | ||
+ | |||
+ | > ...the //why// is important. If you are trying to **meet a specific performance goal** you can save money by identifying performance bottlenecks and upgrading the relevant components. If you want to do the upgrades because they sound like **a fun project** then throw all the parts at it you want with my sincere blessing. I certainly am not immune to fun projects. -- secessus((https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
====== upgrading an existing power setup ====== | ====== upgrading an existing power setup ====== | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
So your existing [[electrical: | So your existing [[electrical: | ||
Line 10: | Line 24: | ||
- | * the first step to fixing a problem is to **understand | + | * the first step to fixing a problem is to **understand** |
* human nature leads us to want simple solutions to complex problems | * human nature leads us to want simple solutions to complex problems | ||
* marketers and influencers have vested interests in convincing us that simple solutions exist: | * marketers and influencers have vested interests in convincing us that simple solutions exist: | ||
Line 17: | Line 31: | ||
[[opinion: | [[opinion: | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ===== big picture: | ||
+ | |||
+ | * if your existing system usually meets needs but sometimes falls short in anomalous circumstances | ||
+ | * if your existing system is **close to meeting needs** (like within 10% of hitting [your daily power requirements](https:// | ||
+ | * if your existing system is **far from meeting needs** then other upgrades would be required. | ||
+ | |||
Line 25: | Line 47: | ||
>> defining the real problem is is 90% of the solution | >> defining the real problem is is 90% of the solution | ||
- | ... and that applies here. I understand why we humans don't want to spend time/effort figuring out the probem. It's not fun and we don't get to buy stuff yet. | + | ... and that applies here. I understand why we humans don't want to spend time/effort figuring out the problem. It's not fun and we don't get to buy stuff yet. |
There are two main areas where the problem can reside, or it can be in both. | There are two main areas where the problem can reside, or it can be in both. | ||
Line 34: | Line 56: | ||
Patient - "it hurts when I do //this// (sticks finger in eye)" \\ | Patient - "it hurts when I do //this// (sticks finger in eye)" \\ | ||
- | Doctor - "So stop doing that." | + | Doctor - "Stop doing that." |
Some loads are mandatory and we can't "stop doing that" | Some loads are mandatory and we can't "stop doing that" | ||
Line 46: | Line 68: | ||
==== supply problems ==== | ==== supply problems ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Supply problems can the broken down into charging, bank capacity, and throughput bottlenecks. | ||
+ | |||
+ | === charging bottlenecks === | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | === bank capacity bottlenecks === | ||
+ | |||
+ | === throughput bottlenecks === | ||