This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
electrical:12v:alternator_charging_rates [2023/09/10 13:11] frater_secessus [estimating combiner charging] |
electrical:12v:alternator_charging_rates [2023/09/10 13:25] (current) frater_secessus [estimating combiner charging] |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | ====== How much will by battery charge by alternator? ====== | + | DRAFT |
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ====== How much will my battery charge by alternator? ====== | ||
This should be easy, right? | This should be easy, right? | ||
Line 6: | Line 9: | ||
We know the time part because we're the ones driving. | We know the time part because we're the ones driving. | ||
- | |||
===== TLDR ===== | ===== TLDR ===== | ||
Line 44: | Line 46: | ||
- | ==== estimating DC-DC charging ==== | + | ===== estimating DC-DC charging |
- | DC-DC charging rates are more predictable because of how they work. A 20A DC-DC will likely pump 20A into the bank most of the time. So 3 hours driving x 20A = 60Ah returned to the battery bank. The price of this predictability (and other features) is... price. | + | DC-DC charging rates are more predictable because of how they work. A 20A DC-DC will likely pump 20A into the bank most of the time. So 1/2 hour driving x 20A = 10Ah returned to the battery bank. The price of this predictability (and other features) is... price. |
- | If you need predictable charging then DC-DC is likely the answer. | + | If you need predictable charging then DC-DC is likely the answer. There are [[electrical: |
- | ==== estimating combiner charging ==== | + | ===== estimating combiner charging |
This is the tough one. We know roughly where the charge rate will start out for discharged batteries (≤0.33C) but the taper complicates things. | This is the tough one. We know roughly where the charge rate will start out for discharged batteries (≤0.33C) but the taper complicates things. | ||
Line 56: | Line 58: | ||
**NOTE**: | **NOTE**: | ||
- | * **FLA** taper is steep; | + | * **FLA** taper is steep; |
- | * 100Ah x .15C = 15A. | + | * 100Ah x .12C = 12A. |
- | * 0.5hours of driving x 15A = 7.5Ah replaced. | + | * 0.5hours of driving x 12A = 6Ah replaced. |
- | * **AGM** taper is more gradual, so charging currrent stays higher on short drives. It might only taper to 0.15C by the end of the drive. | + | * **AGM** taper is more gradual, so charging currrent stays higher on short drives. It might only taper to 0.15C by the end of the drive. |
* **Lithium** has an odd taper because the charging voltage curve is not linear. | * **Lithium** has an odd taper because the charging voltage curve is not linear. | ||
- | * in the broad " | + | * in the broad " |
+ | |||
+ | ==== in the real world ==== | ||
+ | In most installs this variability isn't a major issue: | ||
+ | * combiner charging is commonly paired with solar charging (also highly variable!) | ||
+ | * alternator charging is often a backup or "nice when you can get it" charging source. | ||