User Tools

Site Tools


electrical:12v:deep_cycle_battery

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
electrical:12v:deep_cycle_battery [2020/06/10 13:43]
frater_secessus [carbon FLA]
electrical:12v:deep_cycle_battery [2020/06/10 14:07]
frater_secessus [carbon FLA]
Line 92: Line 92:
  
  
-Trojan claims up to 15% more cycles from the RE(("Renewable Energy")) line than non-carbon FLA in solar-charging use.((http://www.trojanbattery.com/new-products/smart-carbon/))  At this writing the cost premium for this <=15% increase in cycles is 21%.(($175 for T-105RE vs $145 for T-105))+  * Rolls calls this "[[http://support.rollsbattery.com/support/solutions/articles/245858-advanced-nam|Advanced NAM]]"((negative [something] material?)) and claims 15% faster charging, increased capacity, and increased cycle life 
 +  * Trojan claims up to 15% more cycles from the RE(("Renewable Energy")) line than non-carbon FLA in solar-charging use.((http://www.trojanbattery.com/new-products/smart-carbon/))  At this writing the cost premium for this <=15% increase in cycles is 21%.(($175 for T-105RE vs $145 for T-105))  This would be an extra 9 months of life assuming a 5yr lifespan.
    
  
electrical/12v/deep_cycle_battery.txt · Last modified: 2024/04/15 01:00 by frater_secessus