electrical:12v:deep_cycle_battery
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision
Previous revision
|
Next revision
Both sides next revision
|
electrical:12v:deep_cycle_battery [2020/06/10 13:45] frater_secessus [carbon FLA] |
electrical:12v:deep_cycle_battery [2020/06/10 14:07] frater_secessus [carbon FLA] |
| |
| |
Trojan claims up to 15% more cycles from the RE(("Renewable Energy")) line than non-carbon FLA in solar-charging use.((http://www.trojanbattery.com/new-products/smart-carbon/)) At this writing the cost premium for this <=15% increase in cycles is 21%.(($175 for T-105RE vs $145 for T-105)) This would be an extra 9 months of life assuming a 5yr lifespan. | * Rolls calls this "[[http://support.rollsbattery.com/support/solutions/articles/245858-advanced-nam|Advanced NAM]]"((negative [something] material?)) and claims 15% faster charging, increased capacity, and increased cycle life |
| * Trojan claims up to 15% more cycles from the RE(("Renewable Energy")) line than non-carbon FLA in solar-charging use.((http://www.trojanbattery.com/new-products/smart-carbon/)) At this writing the cost premium for this <=15% increase in cycles is 21%.(($175 for T-105RE vs $145 for T-105)) This would be an extra 9 months of life assuming a 5yr lifespan. |
| |
| |
electrical/12v/deep_cycle_battery.txt · Last modified: 2024/04/15 01:00 by frater_secessus