This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision | Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
electrical:solar [2020/02/16 11:14] frater_secessus [weather-related issues] |
electrical:solar [2020/05/10 10:31] frater_secessus [temperature] |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 95: | Line 95: | ||
==== temperature ==== | ==== temperature ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | [based on [[https:// | ||
Panels yield the most power in cold temperatures. | Panels yield the most power in cold temperatures. | ||
+ | ===== mounting the panels ===== | ||
+ | There are a few issues to consider: | ||
+ | |||
+ | * solar cells get very hot in sunlight, typically 25deg C hotter than ambient temps. Rating lab tests are performed when the cells are 25deg C (0deg C ambient, freezing) | ||
+ | * [[electrical: | ||
+ | hot panels re-radiate heat onto the roof of the van. "On my white van (even with a 5" airgap) it is hotter in the | ||
+ | shade under the panels than on the roof in direct sunlight." | ||
+ | * we prefer fewer holes in the van roof when possible | ||
+ | * " | ||
+ | * airgapped panels will add height for drive-through adventures | ||
+ | * taller racks will likely increase air drag and MPG, particularly if you drive fast | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Mounting hard panels to a rack** increases airflow (thereby reducing heat-related power losses), reduces heat transfer, and minimizes the number of holes in the van roof. | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Mounting hard panels directly to the roof** still allows some airgap (the depth of the frame) and the roof corrugations will allow some airflow in the direction of the " | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Mounting flex panels to the roof** allows some airflow in the corrugations but no airgap. Good news: panel derating won't be so bad because the heat is conducted to your van roof. Which is bad news if it's already hot in your van. | ||
+ | Opinion: |