RV and vandwellers wiki

User Tools

Site Tools

Trace:
electrical:solar:charge_controller

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision 		Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
electrical:solar:charge_controller [2022/08/03 19:58]
frater_secessus [connection order] 		electrical:solar:charge_controller [2022/08/09 14:12]
frater_secessus [MPPT]
Line 43: Line 43:
 high for system needs((particularly with higher than nominal 12v panels )) the controller performs a DC-DC conversion to bring the voltage down to a directly usable level.  Because **current through a conductor is directly proportional to voltage**((https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ohm%27s_law)) this downconversion effectively turns excess voltage into increased amps.(minus conversion losses).   high for system needs((particularly with higher than nominal 12v panels )) the controller performs a DC-DC conversion to bring the voltage down to a directly usable level.  Because **current through a conductor is directly proportional to voltage**((https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ohm%27s_law)) this downconversion effectively turns excess voltage into increased amps.(minus conversion losses).  
  
-This ability to decouple panel and bank voltage can result in 10%-30% more power harvested from 12v nominal panels than with a PWM controller.  Marketers like to call this "boost" or "gains" but it really just full capture of whatever power the panel[s] can provide under given conditions.+This ability to decouple panel and bank voltage can result in 10%-30% more power harvested from 12v nominal panels than with a PWM controller, depending on conditions.  //Average// daily production with MPPT is typically ~+15%((https://www.redalyc.org/journal/849/84959429001/html/)), which may or may not justify the added cost on its own.   
  
 === "boost" effect === === "boost" effect ===
Line 222: Line 223:
 > The reason for the low side switching is the intersection between physics and economics.  N-channel field effect transistors are faster, better, cheaper than P-channel parts.  The designer can A) use good parts in a simple circuit or B) use more expensive not so good parts or C) make a complicated circuit that uses 18 volts to control a 15 volt switch.((http://www.cheaprvliving.com/forums/showthread.php?tid=24605&pid=307539#pid307539)) > The reason for the low side switching is the intersection between physics and economics.  N-channel field effect transistors are faster, better, cheaper than P-channel parts.  The designer can A) use good parts in a simple circuit or B) use more expensive not so good parts or C) make a complicated circuit that uses 18 volts to control a 15 volt switch.((http://www.cheaprvliving.com/forums/showthread.php?tid=24605&pid=307539#pid307539))
  
 +===== further reading =====
 +
 +  * [[https://www.solar4rvs.com.au/buying/buyer-guides/choosing-the-right-solar-charge-controller-regulat/|exceptional article on charge controllers]] by Solar4RVs
electrical/solar/charge_controller.txt · Last modified: 2024/04/16 20:28 by frater_secessus

Page Tools

Except where otherwise noted, content on this wiki is licensed under the following license: CC Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 International

affilliate disclosure

CC Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 International Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki