User Tools

Site Tools


electrical:solar:gentle_complexity

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Last revision Both sides next revision
electrical:solar:gentle_complexity [2017/11/09 10:32]
frater_secessus
electrical:solar:gentle_complexity [2017/11/09 15:56]
frater_secessus [Gentle introduction, Pt 2]
Line 3: Line 3:
 This is a collection of illustrations that things are more complex than can be revealed in [[electrical:​solar:​gentle_intro|a one-page intro]]. ​ Again, drill down for more info. This is a collection of illustrations that things are more complex than can be revealed in [[electrical:​solar:​gentle_intro|a one-page intro]]. ​ Again, drill down for more info.
  
 +-----
  
 **Solar panel output will almost never be as high as the claimed output.** ​ In fact it will probably hover around 75% of that number under the best conditions; ​ this is called "​[[electrical:​solar:​output#​panel_temperature|derating]]",​ or correcting output to actual conditions. ​ It sounds like fraud but it's not.  A panel'​s power is expressed as a "​nominal"​ rating like 100W as when tested under //​laboratory//​ conditions. ​ Since the roof of your van is unlikely to meet those same lab conditions, if you think you need 200W of panel you probably need 250W. **Solar panel output will almost never be as high as the claimed output.** ​ In fact it will probably hover around 75% of that number under the best conditions; ​ this is called "​[[electrical:​solar:​output#​panel_temperature|derating]]",​ or correcting output to actual conditions. ​ It sounds like fraud but it's not.  A panel'​s power is expressed as a "​nominal"​ rating like 100W as when tested under //​laboratory//​ conditions. ​ Since the roof of your van is unlikely to meet those same lab conditions, if you think you need 200W of panel you probably need 250W.
Line 24: Line 25:
 **[[http://​rvwiki.mousetrap.net/​doku.php?​id=electrical:​12v:​deep_cycle_battery#​agm|AGM]] lead-acid batteries are not well suited to solar-only charging**. ​ They cost about 2x that of FLA, have less capacity, require vigourous charging and cannot be charged as high in voltage. ​ They remain popular because people think "$$$ is better"​ and are loathe to vent their banks. **[[http://​rvwiki.mousetrap.net/​doku.php?​id=electrical:​12v:​deep_cycle_battery#​agm|AGM]] lead-acid batteries are not well suited to solar-only charging**. ​ They cost about 2x that of FLA, have less capacity, require vigourous charging and cannot be charged as high in voltage. ​ They remain popular because people think "$$$ is better"​ and are loathe to vent their banks.
  
 +It is possible (though uncommon) to have **one all-purpose battery for both house and starting**. ​ This only works when [[electrical:​solar:​sizing#​your_daily_power_needs|daily power requirements]] are quite low((40-50Ah/​day)) or when [[electrical:​solar:​nonessential|opportunity loads]] are agressively utilized. ​ There are two approaches to such a setup: 
 +  - the premium battery deep-cycling approach as used by Sternwake((http://​www.cheaprvliving.com/​forums/​Thread-Has-anyone-heard-of-Northstar-AGM-batteries?​pid=135811#​pid135811)) This requires attention and knowledge. 
 +  - the "make do" [[electrical:​solar:​shallow_cycling|shallow-cycling]] approach. ​ This is more suitable for car dwellers and folks on limited resources.
  
  
electrical/solar/gentle_complexity.txt · Last modified: 2017/11/09 16:11 by frater_secessus