User Tools

Site Tools


electrical:solar:panel-bank_ratio

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
electrical:solar:panel-bank_ratio [2020/06/24 21:05]
frater_secessus [1:2 underpaneling]
electrical:solar:panel-bank_ratio [2020/06/24 21:47]
frater_secessus [1:1]
Line 6: Line 6:
 This generally considered the minimum, though it will likely work out fine in [[electrical:solar:output|sunny areas]] with light [[electrical:12v:loads|loads]].  It may not be enough in the winter when the sun is low and daylight short. This generally considered the minimum, though it will likely work out fine in [[electrical:solar:output|sunny areas]] with light [[electrical:12v:loads|loads]].  It may not be enough in the winter when the sun is low and daylight short.
 [[electrical:solar:rationing|Power rationing]] may be necessary. [[electrical:solar:rationing|Power rationing]] may be necessary.
 +
 +Working backwards, successfully fully charging lead-chemisties by solar means only requires about 8.45hrs of Full Sun Equivalent on MPPT, and about 9.7hrs FSE with PWM. There is nowhere in CONUS that has 8.45hrs of FSE even under ideal conditions.
 +
 +
 ===== 2:1 overpaneling ===== ===== 2:1 overpaneling =====
 //2:1// == 200W solar + 100Ah of battery.  //2:1// == 200W solar + 100Ah of battery. 
electrical/solar/panel-bank_ratio.txt ยท Last modified: 2023/10/22 10:45 by frater_secessus