User Tools

Site Tools


electrical:solar:panel-bank_ratio

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
electrical:solar:panel-bank_ratio [2020/06/24 22:29]
frater_secessus [1:1]
electrical:solar:panel-bank_ratio [2020/06/24 22:29]
frater_secessus [2:1 overpaneling]
Line 16: Line 16:
 This slightly [[electrical:solar:overpaneling|overpaneled]] configuration brings in extra power for heavier loads or for use in areas without much sun.  This slightly [[electrical:solar:overpaneling|overpaneled]] configuration brings in extra power for heavier loads or for use in areas without much sun. 
  
-Working backwards, successfully fully charging lead-chemisties by solar means only requires about 4.25hrs of Full Sun Equivalent on MPPT, and about 4.85hrs FSE with PWM. +Working backwards, successfully fully charging lead-chemistries by 2:1 solar requires about 4.25hrs of Full Sun Equivalent on MPPT, and about 4.85hrs FSE with PWM. 
  
 On average, this would work in Little Rock, San Francisco, Phoenix, Birmingham, Atlanta, New Orleans, Albuquerque, Tulsa, Las Vegas, San Antonio, Houston, Salt Lake City, and Casper Wyoming.  Winters will require power management. On average, this would work in Little Rock, San Francisco, Phoenix, Birmingham, Atlanta, New Orleans, Albuquerque, Tulsa, Las Vegas, San Antonio, Houston, Salt Lake City, and Casper Wyoming.  Winters will require power management.
electrical/solar/panel-bank_ratio.txt ยท Last modified: 2023/10/22 10:45 by frater_secessus