This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
opinion:frater_secessus:charging_faster [2020/04/27 21:05] frater_secessus [lead-acid] |
opinion:frater_secessus:charging_faster [2020/04/27 21:11] frater_secessus [lead-acid] |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
MaineSail found that | MaineSail found that | ||
- | * charging AGM at C/2.5 (max rate) resulted in the battery being 63.3% " | + | * charging AGM at C/2.5 (max rate) resulted in the battery being 63.3% " |
* charging AGM at C/5 (min rate) resulted in the battery being 77.4% " | * charging AGM at C/5 (min rate) resulted in the battery being 77.4% " | ||
Note that the **using 2x the charging current only sped up the whole process by 12 minutes (3.6%)** due to Vabs starting earlier but taking longer. Getting to Vabs faster could be [[electrical: | Note that the **using 2x the charging current only sped up the whole process by 12 minutes (3.6%)** due to Vabs starting earlier but taking longer. Getting to Vabs faster could be [[electrical: | ||
+ | |||
+ | Also note that for simple, timer-based Absorption configurations((like 180 minutes)) the slower charging regiment would actually complete more Absorption.((180/ | ||
+ | |||
===== lithium ===== | ===== lithium ===== |