User Tools

Site Tools


opinion:frater_secessus:charging_faster

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
opinion:frater_secessus:charging_faster [2020/04/27 21:08]
frater_secessus [lead-acid]
opinion:frater_secessus:charging_faster [2020/05/13 12:10]
frater_secessus [charging faster isn't always better]
Line 2: Line 2:
  
  
-There is a common misperception that charging one's battery banks //faster// is //better// or worth throwing more money at.  Here are some reasons it is not always true:+There is a common misperception that charging one's battery banks //faster// is //better// or that having more charging capacity guarantees faster charging.  Here are some reasons it is not always true: 
  
 ===== lead-acid ===== ===== lead-acid =====
Line 18: Line 19:
 MaineSail found that  MaineSail found that 
  
-  * charging AGM at C/2.5 (max rate) resulted in the battery being 63.3% "full" at Vabs and being fully charged in **5hrs, 30 minutes** (20min Bulk, 5hr 10mins Absorption)+  * charging AGM at C/2.5 (max rate) resulted in the battery being 63.3% "full"((amp-wise)) at Vabs and being fully charged in **5hrs, 30 minutes** (20min Bulk, 5hr 10mins Absorption)
   * charging AGM at C/5 (min rate) resulted in the battery being 77.4% "full" at Vabs and being fully charged in **5hrs, 42 minutes** (76min Bulk, 4hr 26mins Absorption)   * charging AGM at C/5 (min rate) resulted in the battery being 77.4% "full" at Vabs and being fully charged in **5hrs, 42 minutes** (76min Bulk, 4hr 26mins Absorption)
  
opinion/frater_secessus/charging_faster.txt · Last modified: 2023/07/15 11:05 by frater_secessus