User Tools

Site Tools


opinion:frater_secessus:charging_faster

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
opinion:frater_secessus:charging_faster [2020/06/07 18:55]
frater_secessus [lead-acid]
opinion:frater_secessus:charging_faster [2020/11/04 16:23]
frater_secessus [lead-acid]
Line 22: Line 22:
   * charging AGM at C/5 (min rate) resulted in the battery being 77.4% "full" at Vabs and being fully charged in **5hrs, 42 minutes** (76min Bulk, 4hr 26mins Absorption)   * charging AGM at C/5 (min rate) resulted in the battery being 77.4% "full" at Vabs and being fully charged in **5hrs, 42 minutes** (76min Bulk, 4hr 26mins Absorption)
  
-Note that the **using 2x the charging current only sped up the whole process by 12 minutes (3.6%)** due to Vabs starting earlier but taking longer. Getting to Vabs faster could be [[electrical:solar:pwm_tweaking|preferable on PWM controllers]]+Note that the **using 2x the charging current only sped up the whole process by 12 minutes (3.6%)** due to Vabs starting earlier but taking longer. 
  
-Also note that for simple, timer-based Absorption configurations((like 180 minutes)) the slower charging regiment would actually complete more Absorption.((180/266mins rather than 180/310mins))+* **Getting to Vabs faster** could be [[electrical:solar:pwm_tweaking|preferable on PWM controllers]]as the system would be making max power for a longer period of time.  
 +* **Getting to Vabs slower** could be preferable on timer-based Absorption configurations((like 180 minutes)), as slower charging regiment would reduced the required Absorption duration.((180/266mins rather than 180/310mins))
  
  
opinion/frater_secessus/charging_faster.txt · Last modified: 2023/07/15 11:05 by frater_secessus