This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
opinion:frater_secessus:charging_faster [2020/06/07 18:55] frater_secessus [lead-acid] |
opinion:frater_secessus:charging_faster [2023/07/15 11:05] (current) frater_secessus [lithium] |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
* charging AGM at C/5 (min rate) resulted in the battery being 77.4% " | * charging AGM at C/5 (min rate) resulted in the battery being 77.4% " | ||
- | Note that the **using 2x the charging current only sped up the whole process by 12 minutes (3.6%)** due to Vabs starting earlier but taking longer. Getting to Vabs faster could be [[electrical: | + | Note that the **using 2x the charging current only sped up the whole process by 12 minutes (3.6%)** due to Vabs starting earlier but taking longer. |
- | Also note that for simple, timer-based Absorption configurations((like 180 minutes)) | + | * **Getting to Vabs faster** could be [[electrical: |
+ | * **Getting to Vabs slower** could be preferable on timer-based Absorption configurations((like 180 minutes)), as slower charging regiment would reduce the required | ||
Line 30: | Line 31: | ||
- | **Lithium batteries** can slurp up current wildly, but shouldn' | + | **Lithium batteries** can slurp up current wildly, but shouldn' |
+ | |||
+ | In commercial examples the BMS will limit current | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Limiting charging | ||