User Tools

Site Tools


opinion:frater_secessus:panelsizesforinsolation

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Last revision Both sides next revision
opinion:frater_secessus:panelsizesforinsolation [2022/05/08 10:35]
frater_secessus [Solar panel sizing for different geographical areas] fse = kWh
opinion:frater_secessus:panelsizesforinsolation [2022/07/20 16:40]
frater_secessus [Amount of solar wattage required per 100Ah of Pb] further reading
Line 10: Line 10:
 This page is a rough attempt to show how geographical location and meteorological conditions affect the amount of solar wattage one needs.  This page is a rough attempt to show how geographical location and meteorological conditions affect the amount of solar wattage one needs. 
  
-**Reminder:**  available sunlight ([[electrical:solar:output#insolation|insolation]]) is expressed in Hours of Full Sun Equivalent (FSE) compared to lab conditions.  So an entire cloudy day might provide only 2 hours of FSE, meaning it would be the same amount of sunlight as 2 hours of full sunlight under lab conditions (1000w/sq meter).  Therefore **2 hours of FSE = 2kWh**((and 7.2MJ (megajoules) for our metric friends)).  +**Reminder:**  available sunlight ([[electrical:solar:output#insolation|insolation]]) is expressed in Hours of **Full Sun Equivalent (FSE)** compared to lab conditions.  So an entire cloudy day might provide only 2 hours of FSE, meaning it would be the same amount of sunlight as 2 hours of full sunlight under lab conditions (1000w/sq meter).  Therefore **2 hours of FSE = 2kWh**.((and 7.2MJ (megajoules) for our metric friends))  Multiply [FSE for the time/place] x [rated panel wattage] to see what see how many watts your system would harvest on average if it were perfectly efficient.((hint:  it's not)).  Example:  4 hours of FSE x 200w = 800Wh, or 0.8kWh, before various losses.((see Assumptions section at bottom for typical losses))
  
  
 Historical weather info is also used to calculate FSE, so good/bad weather is already baked into the average. Historical weather info is also used to calculate FSE, so good/bad weather is already baked into the average.
  
-Ambient temperatures also affect panel output, and that is silently factored into the bottom table. +
  
  
Line 56: Line 56:
 Assumptions: Assumptions:
  
 +  * panel output is temperature-derated according to daily average high at each time/place
   * **no other loads** other than charging are present   * **no other loads** other than charging are present
-  * AGM deep cycle battery is discharged to [[electrical:depth_of_discharge|50% DoD]] nightly and [[electrical:12v:charging|fully charged]] the next day+  * AGM deep cycle battery is discharged to [[electrical:depth_of_discharge|50% DoD]] nightly and [[electrical:12v:charging|fully charged]] the next day.  Charging efficiency 90%.
   * MPPT controller is 95% efficient   * MPPT controller is 95% efficient
   * PWM yields, overall, 85% of MPPT yield.  PWM yields will be quite close to MPPT yields when other forms of charging is present, as PWM will no longer be [[electrical:solar:pwm_tweaking|hamstrung by low Vbatt]].   * PWM yields, overall, 85% of MPPT yield.  PWM yields will be quite close to MPPT yields when other forms of charging is present, as PWM will no longer be [[electrical:solar:pwm_tweaking|hamstrung by low Vbatt]].
Line 64: Line 65:
   * [[electrical:solar:output#panel_temperature|temperature-related derating]] baked in based on monthly average high temperatures   * [[electrical:solar:output#panel_temperature|temperature-related derating]] baked in based on monthly average high temperatures
   * due to lower internal resistance **lithium will accept more charge from alternator/generator** than AGM by the time it reaches the charging source's voltage setpoint, thereby requiring somewhat less panel wattage. Likewise, flooded batteries will accept //less// than AGM and then require more panel.     * due to lower internal resistance **lithium will accept more charge from alternator/generator** than AGM by the time it reaches the charging source's voltage setpoint, thereby requiring somewhat less panel wattage. Likewise, flooded batteries will accept //less// than AGM and then require more panel.  
-  * solar-only charging the same number of amps into lithium would require about 15% less panel than lead due to better charging efficiency.  Lithium can be charged successfully off alternator/generator only so no panel would be required.+  * solar-only charging the same number of amps into lithium would require about 10% less panel than AGM due to better charging efficiency.  Lithium can be charged successfully off alternator/generator only so [[electrical:12v:mandatory_solar|no panel would be required]]. 
 + 
 +===== further reading =====
  
 +  * factors affecting [[electrical:solar:output|solar harvest]]
opinion/frater_secessus/panelsizesforinsolation.txt · Last modified: 2024/03/20 00:01 by frater_secessus