User Tools

Site Tools


opinion:frater_secessus:solar_harvest

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Last revision Both sides next revision
opinion:frater_secessus:solar_harvest [2023/02/17 15:07]
frater_secessus [ununsual scenarios]
opinion:frater_secessus:solar_harvest [2023/02/17 15:17]
frater_secessus [observations]
Line 36: Line 36:
   * exceptionally low yield - less than 5% of rated   * exceptionally low yield - less than 5% of rated
       * thunderstorms, typically 10W, less than 2% of rated.       * thunderstorms, typically 10W, less than 2% of rated.
 +
 +===== correlation with available direct light =====
 +
 +This is harder to grasp and compute, but increases accuracy by factoring in location, time, etc.((It cannot account for //indirect// light by refraction, reflection,etc. The contribution of indirect light is considered to be +15% in clear skies.))
 +
 +1.  find solar zenith angle with app or calculator
 +1.  derive cosine of the above; this is the percentage of direct sunlight landing on a flat surface
 +1.  multiply this value by panel wattage
 +1.  the result is the theoretical direct light available at that time/place under clear skies.((since MPPT-based system losses typically are -15% and indirect lighting is +15%, an MPPT-based system might make this direct-light power level under clear skies.)) 
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
  
  
opinion/frater_secessus/solar_harvest.txt ยท Last modified: 2023/02/17 15:20 by frater_secessus