User Tools

Site Tools


opinion:frater_secessus:solar_harvest

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
opinion:frater_secessus:solar_harvest [2023/02/17 15:07]
frater_secessus [ununsual scenarios]
opinion:frater_secessus:solar_harvest [2023/02/17 15:20] (current)
frater_secessus [correlation with available direct light]
Line 36: Line 36:
   * exceptionally low yield - less than 5% of rated   * exceptionally low yield - less than 5% of rated
       * thunderstorms, typically 10W, less than 2% of rated.       * thunderstorms, typically 10W, less than 2% of rated.
 +
 +===== correlation with available direct light =====
 +
 +This is harder to grasp and compute, but increases accuracy by factoring in location, time, etc.((It cannot account for //indirect// light by refraction, reflection,etc. The contribution of indirect light is considered to be +15% in clear skies.))
 +
 +  -  find solar zenith angle with app or calculator
 +  -  derive cosine of the above; this is the percentage of direct sunlight landing on a flat surface
 +  -  multiply this value by panel wattage
 +  - the result is the theoretical direct light available at that time/place under clear skies.((since MPPT-based system losses typically are -15% and indirect lighting is +15%, an MPPT-based system might make this direct-light power level under clear skies.)) 
 +
 +I have observed the following cosine-based direct light percentages:
 +
 +  * clear skies:   98% of theoretical direct sun
 +  * bright overcast skies (shadows thrown):  82% of theoretical direct sun
 +  * overcast: 58% of theoretical direct sun
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
  
  
opinion/frater_secessus/solar_harvest.1676664464.txt.gz ยท Last modified: 2023/02/17 15:07 by frater_secessus