This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
opinion:frater_secessus:the_case_for_agm [2020/05/02 00:01] frater_secessus |
opinion:frater_secessus:the_case_for_agm [2020/05/02 00:04] frater_secessus |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
====== the case for AGM ====== | ====== the case for AGM ====== | ||
- | There really | + | There are situations where AGM is worth spending twice as much compared to flooded lead-acid. |
* the ‘dweller installs the battery bank in a location where it is not reachable for normal maintenance | * the ‘dweller installs the battery bank in a location where it is not reachable for normal maintenance | ||
* the ‘dweller needs to mount the battery on its side for some esoteric reason (or is 4×4 trekking so the RV itself can end up in weird angles) | * the ‘dweller needs to mount the battery on its side for some esoteric reason (or is 4×4 trekking so the RV itself can end up in weird angles) | ||
- | * the ‘dweller chooses to run heavier-than-normal loads like microwaves, electric coffeemakers, | + | * the ‘dweller chooses to run heavier-than-normal |
- | * the ‘dweller has has a chemical hypersensitivity. | + | * the ‘dweller has has an actual (not imagined) |
* the advanced ‘dweller is running a single battery for both house and starter systems (“[[electrical: | * the advanced ‘dweller is running a single battery for both house and starter systems (“[[electrical: | ||