electrical:solar:charge_controller
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision
Previous revision
|
Next revision
Both sides next revision
|
electrical:solar:charge_controller [2023/09/06 12:05] frater_secessus [MPPT] |
electrical:solar:charge_controller [2023/09/06 12:18] frater_secessus [PWM] |
| |
[[https://diysolarforum.com/threads/why-is-mppt-better-than-pwm.24892/post-295861|For technical reasons]] PWM can deliver more current than the panels' Imp, even nearing Isc. | [[https://diysolarforum.com/threads/why-is-mppt-better-than-pwm.24892/post-295861|For technical reasons]] PWM can deliver more current than the panels' Imp, even nearing Isc. |
| |
| === panel selection for PWM === |
| |
| PWM makes the most power when coupled with panels whose operating [[electrical:solar:panels#specifications|Vmp]] is very close to the controller's Absorption ("boost") voltage [[electrical:solar:charge_controller_setpoints|setpoint]]. Since [[electrical:solar:output#panel_temperature|ambient temperatures affect operating Vmp]] the panel's Vmp spec on the label should be about 10% higher than Absorption voltage. |
| |
| Examples: |
| |
| * 16.28v Vmp panel spec would be optimal for 14.8v Absorption, as we might use for flooded lead acid. 14.8v x 1.1 = 16.28v. |
| * 15.62v Vmp panel spec would be optimal for 14.2v Absorption, as we might use for Gel or LiFePO4. |
| |
| |
| Some [[electrical:solar:panels#thin_film|thin-film]] panels have Vmp in that range but most panels are much higher. So we find the lowest Vmp practical. 17Vmp panels would perform better on PWM than 18v or 19v. |
==== MPPT ==== | ==== MPPT ==== |
[[http://amzn.to/2iD3WKf|{{ https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/51bi9IjcsRL._AC_US160_.jpg}}]] | [[http://amzn.to/2iD3WKf|{{ https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/51bi9IjcsRL._AC_US160_.jpg}}]] |
electrical/solar/charge_controller.txt ยท Last modified: 2024/07/01 22:48 by frater_secessus