This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
electrical:autonomy [2024/07/16 12:08] frater_secessus [TL;DR] |
electrical:autonomy [2024/08/23 21:12] (current) frater_secessus [minimizing the required days of autonomy] |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | [draft] | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
====== Days of Autonomy ====== | ====== Days of Autonomy ====== | ||
===== TL;DR ===== | ===== TL;DR ===== | ||
- | * Days of autonomy (or reserve) is the number of days of power one stores for periods of reduced or non-existent | + | * Days of autonomy (or reserve) is the number of days of power one stores for days when zero charging |
* A system whose [[electrical: | * A system whose [[electrical: | ||
* Depending on [[electrical: | * Depending on [[electrical: | ||
[[opinion: | [[opinion: | ||
- | * the decision on how much capacity to purchase is economic as well as technical | + | * the decision on how much capacity to purchase is economic as well as technical. |
+ | * it is possible to reduce the days of autonomy required by reducing consumption on days with less or no charging | ||
Line 28: | Line 32: | ||
* lithium: | * lithium: | ||
+ | He needs 2 days of autonomy to make it through the weekend before the bank is effectively empty. | ||
- | If he is on **shore power** at an RV park for one of those days then (from a power perspective) his off-grid is only 1 day, so his total requirements and required capacity is halved. This is true because shore power is effectively limitless; | + | If he is on **shore power** at an RV park for one of those days then (from a power perspective) his time off-grid is only 1 day, so his total requirements and required capacity is halved. This is true because shore power is effectively limitless; |
Line 41: | Line 46: | ||
==== alternator ==== | ==== alternator ==== | ||
- | **Alternator charging** is a bit more arithmetically complex because it involves both **time the engine is running** and the bank's **current acceptance in Amps** from the alternator. | + | **Alternator charging** is a bit more arithmetically complex because it involves both **time the engine is running** and the bank's **current acceptance in Amps** from the alternator. |
+ | === example === | ||
- | ==== solar ==== | + | Let's assume Joe is driving 1 hour per day and is running a a 30A [[electrical: |
+ | The fractional way to think about this is, after alternator contribution, | ||
+ | ==== solar ==== | ||
- | + | In any given 24hr period [[opinion: | |
- | ; in any given 24hr period [[opinion: | + | |
* on average, the setup will make the power your wattage and [[electrical: | * on average, the setup will make the power your wattage and [[electrical: | ||
Line 59: | Line 65: | ||
Solar harvest is [[electrical: | Solar harvest is [[electrical: | ||
- | ==== example ==== | + | ==== examples ==== |
+ | |||
+ | There are a couple of approaches here: | ||
+ | |||
+ | * solar as a "best effort" | ||
+ | * solar as the main or sole charging source for long durations - complex, space-intensive, | ||
+ | |||
+ | === best effort solar === | ||
+ | |||
+ | Mount whatever you choose. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | === reliable solar === | ||
+ | |||
+ | This scenario is completely different; | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ===== economic factors ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | The decision between larger bank vs smaller bank + field charging is up to Joe. The frequency and duration of his outings will affect the cost/ | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | If his requirements are modest and outings are short and infrequent he might buy enough Wh to make it through his campouts with zero charging. | ||
+ | |||
+ | If his requirements are heavier or outings longer, more frequent (or even full-time) then it is no longer practical to buy enough Wh to cover the outing; | ||
+ | |||
+ | In general, larger banks are cheaper by the Amp-hour. | ||
+ | ===== factors related to C-rates ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | A [[electrical: | ||
+ | |||
+ | Different battery chemistries have C-rates they can // | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== charging ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | LFP prefers 0.2C charging (20A per 100Ah of capacity) and will tolerate 0.5C (50A per 100Ah). | ||
+ | |||
+ | Having a larger bank could allow you to charge harder from the alternator((assuming the alternator can handle it)), Amp-wise, and still stay within the 0.5C limit. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ==== discharging ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | If your LFP has a 0.5C constant discharge rating then doubling the Ah capacity doubles the load current you can apply to the bank. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== minimizing the required days of autonomy ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | * reduce optional power consumption during periods of low solar harvest. | ||
+ | * think in fractional days of autonomy (see above) | ||
+ | * If your schedule is flexible you might adjust your plans for days where it is forecast to be rainy/ | ||
+ | * plan your relocation drives for those days so you can take advantage of [[electrical: | ||
+ | * if you schedule a day in a paid campsite from time to time to dump tanks and take on water, do so on projected days of poor solar harvest. | ||
+ | * assuming you have space, max out the roof with as much used [[electrical: | ||
+ | * a small portable array on its own controller can punch far above its weight: | ||
+ | * it's a bit extreme, but a [[electrical: | ||
+ |