This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
electrical:solar:panel-bank_ratio [2020/06/25 02:30] frater_secessus [3:1 overpaneling] |
electrical:solar:panel-bank_ratio [2023/10/22 14:45] (current) frater_secessus [1:1] |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| ===== 1:1 ===== | ===== 1:1 ===== | ||
| //1:1// == 200W solar + 200Ah battery bank. | //1:1// == 200W solar + 200Ah battery bank. | ||
| - | This generally considered the minimum, | + | This is generally considered the minimum, |
| - | [[electrical: | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Working backwards, fully charging lead-chemistries by 1:1 solar means requires about 8.45hrs of Full Sun Equivalent on MPPT, and about 9.7hrs FSE with PWM. **There is nowhere in the United States that averages 8.45hrs of FSE year around**. | + | |
| + | [[https:// | ||
| + | Workarounds: | ||
| + | * add [[electrical: | ||
| + | * use a battery chemistry that charges more efficiently and doesn' | ||
| + | * fully-charging lead becomes possible with attentive panel tilt, requiring only 5.5hrs on MPPT and 6.4hrs on PWM. | ||
| + | * fully-charging lead becomes possible with shallower cycling, like 75%. This is the equivalent of the 2:1 systems below. | ||
| ===== 2:1 overpaneling ===== | ===== 2:1 overpaneling ===== | ||
| Line 39: | Line 42: | ||
| Different battery types have different charging requirements: | Different battery types have different charging requirements: | ||
| - | * lithium - no minimum, charge at any rate up to the max | + | * lithium - no minimum, charge at any rate((see [[electrical: |
| * flooded lead-acid: | * flooded lead-acid: | ||
| * minimum ratio with MPPT = 1.25w:1ah | * minimum ratio with MPPT = 1.25w:1ah | ||