User Tools

Site Tools


opinion:frater_secessus:efficiency

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
opinion:frater_secessus:efficiency [2025/04/30 11:56]
frater_secessus ["Efficient"]
opinion:frater_secessus:efficiency [2025/04/30 11:57] (current)
frater_secessus ["Efficient"]
Line 9: Line 9:
   * //preferable//   * //preferable//
   * //makes more power//   * //makes more power//
-  * or, more cynically, //the thing I bought//+  * or, perhaps more cynically, //the thing I bought// 
  
-... both without describing the use case. +... without describing the use case. 
  
 It will simplify matters if we think of efficiency as ''power in / power out'' Round numbers example:  if a component requires 220W in to make 200W out then it is ~90% efficient with ~10% lost, typically as heat. It will simplify matters if we think of efficiency as ''power in / power out'' Round numbers example:  if a component requires 220W in to make 200W out then it is ~90% efficient with ~10% lost, typically as heat.
opinion/frater_secessus/efficiency.txt ยท Last modified: 2025/04/30 11:57 by frater_secessus