User Tools

Site Tools


opinion:frater_secessus:efficiency

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
opinion:frater_secessus:efficiency [2025/04/30 11:55]
frater_secessus ["Efficient"]
opinion:frater_secessus:efficiency [2025/04/30 11:57] (current)
frater_secessus ["Efficient"]
Line 7: Line 7:
  
   * //better//    * //better// 
-  * //makes more power// +  * //preferable// 
 +  * //makes more power// 
 +  * or, perhaps more cynically, //the thing I bought// 
  
-... both without describing the use case. +... without describing the use case. 
  
 It will simplify matters if we think of efficiency as ''power in / power out'' Round numbers example:  if a component requires 220W in to make 200W out then it is ~90% efficient with ~10% lost, typically as heat. It will simplify matters if we think of efficiency as ''power in / power out'' Round numbers example:  if a component requires 220W in to make 200W out then it is ~90% efficient with ~10% lost, typically as heat.
Line 15: Line 17:
 Made up examples: Made up examples:
  
-  * 200w inverter, 90% efficient+  * 200w inverter, 85% efficient
   * 1000w inverter, 80% efficient   * 1000w inverter, 80% efficient
  
opinion/frater_secessus/efficiency.1746028524.txt.gz · Last modified: 2025/04/30 11:55 by frater_secessus