User Tools
opinion:frater_secessus:epever
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
opinion:frater_secessus:epever [2022/08/28 16:41] frater_secessus [anecdotes from others] |
opinion:frater_secessus:epever [2024/09/06 20:11] (current) frater_secessus [tracking crashes] |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
| * it will adjust to changing conditions, but it can be slow. One might say " | * it will adjust to changing conditions, but it can be slow. One might say " | ||
| * it can be slow to react after long periods of no load - see [[https:// | * it can be slow to react after long periods of no load - see [[https:// | ||
| - | * it can get confused in complex solar conditions, as with partly-cloudy skies and high winds, or in breezes that move partial shade around on the panels. | + | * it can get confused in complex solar conditions, as with partly-cloudy skies and high winds, or in breezes that move partial shade around on the panels. |
| * the large AN controllers (≥50A) have **undersized terminal screws** which can snap under overzealous tightening. | * the large AN controllers (≥50A) have **undersized terminal screws** which can snap under overzealous tightening. | ||
| * firmware does not appear to be field-upgradable without hacking | * firmware does not appear to be field-upgradable without hacking | ||
| * Absorption duration cannot be zeroed out; the minimum duration is 10 minutes. | * Absorption duration cannot be zeroed out; the minimum duration is 10 minutes. | ||
| + | * Absorption duration max is 180 minutes | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== tracking crashes ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | === videos === | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | * [[https:// | ||
| + | * [[https:// | ||
| + | * [[https:// | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | === anecdotes === | ||
| + | |||
| - | ==== anecdotes from others ==== | ||
| >> My epever often pulls pv voltages down to battery voltage acting like PWM. Getting really annoying now. It works okay with 12v and 17.5v panels, but the bigger panels with a voltage of 35v present a problem on cloudy days. It drags thr voltage down, and doesnt let it back up until i reset the unit. It then lets the panels back up to proper voltage and starts producing decent power again. ([[https:// | >> My epever often pulls pv voltages down to battery voltage acting like PWM. Getting really annoying now. It works okay with 12v and 17.5v panels, but the bigger panels with a voltage of 35v present a problem on cloudy days. It drags thr voltage down, and doesnt let it back up until i reset the unit. It then lets the panels back up to proper voltage and starts producing decent power again. ([[https:// | ||
| Line 43: | Line 56: | ||
| + | >> | ||
| + | |||
| + | >> I have 2 3210AN and one of them have the same problem.. need to disconnect to PV and need 3-5 second to track correctly. it's cause 8% less energy production compare to another one. - [[https:// | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | >> I have 3210AN and the same problem. I only have one panel Risen 440Wp Vmpp 43.8V. In the morning or in the cloudy sky Mppt does not work. Holds 14V about 24W. When disconnected it goes on about 43V and shows 100W. This is annoying. This is evident software error. -- [[https:// | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | >> im having the same issue with epever charge controller. Early morning before the sun fully hits the panels 17 volts and .5 amps from a 60 volt array 300 watt array. I can unplug the panels and reconnect at it goes up to 57 or so volts then slowly drifts back to 17 again. Does the tracking just not work right or what is your opinion. I ran 2 100 watt 18.9 vmp panels on the epever. And 2 on a pwm. The mppt would go from 150 watts in full sun to 100 watt output every 20 minutes or so. And the pwm would steady put out 148 watts. In an all day comparison pwm won producing more watt hours.((https:// | ||
| + | |||
| + | >> I threw out my EPSolar Tracers for the same reason, equal paneling with correct voltages in a test of 3 EP Solar Tracers verses 3 Trace C-40 PWM The old trace units preformed much better. ... [the epever] would slowly sink in PV input volts until reset or maybe 20-30 minutes later would do a full sweep and come up to a decent input voltage. I bought a Classic.....problems gone((https:// | ||
| + | |||
| + | >> After driving with the Victron DC-DC charger kicking on, the Epever MPPT solar charge controller would act similar to a PWM controller: it would read incoming voltage close to the battery' | ||
opinion/frater_secessus/epever.1661719298.txt.gz · Last modified: 2022/08/28 16:41 by frater_secessus
Page Tools
affilliate disclosure | the RVwiki runs on a virtual server from Phanes
Except where otherwise noted, content on this wiki is licensed under the following license: CC Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 International
