RVwiki for vanfolk and others who live in vehicles

User Tools

Site Tools

Trace:
opinion:frater_secessus:mppt_anthills

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision 		Previous revision
opinion:frater_secessus:mppt_anthills [2025/08/06 15:48]
frater_secessus [the basic situation] 		opinion:frater_secessus:mppt_anthills [2025/08/06 16:10] (current)
frater_secessus [multiple (known) anthills of varying heights]
Line 24: Line 24:
 Unbeknownst to you there are really //multiple// anthills.  You could perform the walking algorithm perfectly and still still be on a low anthill  //with no way to know it//.   Unbeknownst to you there are really //multiple// anthills.  You could perform the walking algorithm perfectly and still still be on a low anthill  //with no way to know it//.  
  
-This is like having mixed panels on the same MPPT controller.  There are multiple I/V curves laid on top of each other making, in effect, a lumpy and unpredictable curve.  Normal MPPT have no way to know they are on a lump (local maxima) rather the actual top (maximum non-local power point).   You might luck into the max but don't count on it. +This is like having mixed panels on the same MPPT controller.  There are multiple power curves in play, effectively making a aggregate curve with lumps (high spots) and dips (low spots) in it.  MPPT is looking for a single high spot and can be misled when it finds the first one (of many).  It might luck into ''Pmax'' but don't count on it. 
  
  
Line 31: Line 31:
 If they tell you in advance there may be many different anthills you can explore the entire field and remember each hill you find. Eventually you will find the tallest one.   If they tell you in advance there may be many different anthills you can explore the entire field and remember each hill you find. Eventually you will find the tallest one.  
  
-This is what happens when you use an MPPT with an advanced algorithm that makes full sweeps of the I/V curve instead of looking only for local high spots.  The downside is it cost.+This is what happens when you use an MPPT with an advanced algorithm that makes full sweeps of the power curve instead of looking only for local high spots.  The downside is it cost.
  
   * the controller generally costs more upfront   * the controller generally costs more upfront
Line 37: Line 37:
   * and more time to //keep checking for the max// along the whole curve.  It's no longer good enough to shuffle around a point you already found.     * and more time to //keep checking for the max// along the whole curve.  It's no longer good enough to shuffle around a point you already found.  
  
-During these extended sweeps harvest falls off dramatically because the algo has to check the whole I/V curve, including points that make little-to-no power. +During these extended sweeps harvest falls off dramatically because the algo has to check the whole curve, including points that make little-to-no power. 
  
 This algorithm will find the MPP of the mismatched array but cannot make as much power as different panels/arrays on their own MPPT.  This algorithm will find the MPP of the mismatched array but cannot make as much power as different panels/arrays on their own MPPT. 
opinion/frater_secessus/mppt_anthills.1754495292.txt.gz ยท Last modified: 2025/08/06 15:48 by frater_secessus

Page Tools

affilliate disclosure | the RVwiki runs on a virtual server from NetCup

Except where otherwise noted, content on this wiki is licensed under the following license: CC Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 International
CC Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 International Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki