This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
opinion:frater_secessus:solar_harvest [2023/02/17 15:17] frater_secessus [observations] |
opinion:frater_secessus:solar_harvest [2023/02/17 15:20] (current) frater_secessus [correlation with available direct light] |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
This is harder to grasp and compute, but increases accuracy by factoring in location, time, etc.((It cannot account for // | This is harder to grasp and compute, but increases accuracy by factoring in location, time, etc.((It cannot account for // | ||
- | 1. find solar zenith angle with app or calculator | + | - find solar zenith angle with app or calculator |
- | 1. | + | |
- | 1. | + | |
- | 1. the result is the theoretical direct light available at that time/place under clear skies.((since MPPT-based system losses typically are -15% and indirect lighting is +15%, an MPPT-based system might make this direct-light power level under clear skies.)) | + | |
+ | |||
+ | I have observed the following cosine-based direct light percentages: | ||
+ | |||
+ | * clear skies: | ||
+ | * bright overcast skies (shadows thrown): | ||
+ | * overcast: 58% of theoretical direct sun | ||