This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
opinion:more_power [2025/05/05 16:04] frater_secessus [upgrading an existing power setup] |
opinion:more_power [2025/05/19 13:50] (current) frater_secessus [supply problems] |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
DRAFT | DRAFT | ||
- | >> “It is cheaper and easier to use less power than it is to make more power.” – highdesertranger | + | > “It is cheaper and easier to use less power than it is to make more power.” – highdesertranger |
- | ====== | + | > ...the //why// is important. If you are trying to **meet a specific performance goal** you can save money by identifying performance bottlenecks and upgrading |
- | This article is for people who are considering a house power upgrade to better meet their needs: | ||
- | > ...the why is important. If you are trying to **meet a specific performance goal** you can save money and heartache with minimal-but-functional component upgrades. If you want to do the upgrades because they sound like **a fun project** then throw all the parts at it you want with my sincere blessing. I certainly am not immune to fun projects. -- secessus((https:// | + | |
+ | |||
+ | ====== upgrading an existing power setup ====== | ||
Line 33: | Line 35: | ||
===== big picture: | ===== big picture: | ||
- | * if your existing system usually meets needs but sometimes | + | |
- | * if your existing system is **close to meeting needs** (like within 10% of hitting [your daily power requirements](https:// | + | * if your existing system is **close to meeting needs** |
- | * if your existing system is **far from meeting needs** then other upgrades would be required. | + | * if your existing system is **far from meeting needs** then the [[electrical: |
Line 56: | Line 58: | ||
Doctor - "Stop doing that." | Doctor - "Stop doing that." | ||
- | Some loads are mandatory and we can't "stop doing that" | + | Some loads are mandatory and we can't "stop doing that" |
=== demand scheduling === | === demand scheduling === | ||
Sometimes just changing when the load runs can eliminate/ | Sometimes just changing when the load runs can eliminate/ | ||
- | |||
- | |||
Line 71: | Line 71: | ||
=== charging bottlenecks === | === charging bottlenecks === | ||
+ | |||
+ | Charging bottlenecks occur when the battery bank could happily [[opinion: | ||
+ | |||
+ | A major cause of underperformance is **reliance on a single form of charging**. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | * solar | ||
+ | * maybe we have no solar at all | ||
+ | * maybe we have unused roofspace to devote to more panel | ||
+ | * maybe the panel we have is [[opinion: | ||
+ | * maybe we went with portable panels but [[https:// | ||
+ | * maybe we went with mounted panels but park the rig in the shade. | ||
+ | * alternator | ||
+ | * maybe we are not charging from the alternator at all | ||
+ | * maybe we are forgetting to enable charging from the alt after [[electrical: | ||
+ | * maybe the alternator has [[electrical: | ||
+ | * shore power | ||
+ | * maybe we are not [[electrical: | ||
=== bank capacity bottlenecks === | === bank capacity bottlenecks === | ||
+ | |||
+ | If you can charge the bank consistently but run out of power overnight or in periods of decreased harvest you may just need more bank capacity. | ||
+ | |||
=== throughput bottlenecks === | === throughput bottlenecks === | ||
+ | These are related to the systems above, but are less obvious. | ||
+ | * panels and PWM solar charge controllers poorly matched, resulting in [[electrical: | ||
+ | * insufficient panel wattage | ||
+ | * panel wattage grossly oversized for the MPPT controller (>30% [[electrical: | ||
+ | * DC-DC [[electrical: | ||
+ | * wiring undersized for alternator charging with a combiner (relay/ | ||