| Both sides previous revision
Previous revision
Next revision
|
Previous revision
Last revision
Both sides next revision
|
electrical:solar:overpaneling [2020/10/11 19:48]
127.0.0.1 external edit |
electrical:solar:overpaneling [2023/04/10 16:34]
frater_secessus [vs. battery bank] |
| **Overpaneling** has two related meanings; both refer to having more solar panel output than a system might otherwise require. | **Overpaneling** has two related meanings; both refer to having more solar panel output than a system might otherwise require. |
| |
| * Most common meaning: [[#vs._charge_controller|overpaneled charge controller]] - battery bank and charge controller are evenly matched; panel nominal or actual output is more than the controller's rating. This is the most common meaning. | * Most common meaning: [[#vs._charge_controller|overpaneled charge controller]] - battery bank and charge controller are evenly matched; panel nominal or actual output is more than the MPPT controller's rating. This is the most common meaning. Note: PWM controllers should not be overpaneled as they have no way to limit incoming current to protect themselves. |
| * Less common meaning: [[#vs._battery_bank|overpaneled battery bank]] - solar panels and charge controller are evenly matched; both are oversized compared to battery bank. | * Less common meaning: [[#vs._battery_bank|overpaneled battery bank]] - solar panels and charge controller are evenly matched; both are oversized compared to battery bank. |
| | |
| |
| The overpaneled system's power output bell curve is //shifted upwards// and cut off by the controller when it reaches its limits. This is known as clipping, trimming, or clamping due to the "flat top" appearance of the overpaneled output curve. | The overpaneled system's power output bell curve is //shifted upwards// and cut off by the controller when it reaches its limits. This is known as clipping, trimming, or clamping due to the "flat top" appearance of the overpaneled output curve. |
| | |
| | With appropriate overpaneling the clipping is relatively minor. Victron notes that: |
| | |
| | >> Generally total energy harvested from a 130% panel oversizing results in less than 1% annual energy loss. -- [[https://www.victronenergy.com/blog/2014/03/28/matching-victron-energy-solar-modules-to-the-new-mppt-charge-regulators/|source]] |
| | |
| | |
| |
| **Example:** Consider the image to the right.((The image is that of a different PV-related configuration but it works for our purposes.)) The smaller/interior bell curve is the normally paneled configuration. \\ | **Example:** Consider the image to the right.((The image is that of a different PV-related configuration but it works for our purposes.)) The smaller/interior bell curve is the normally paneled configuration. \\ |
| |
| Since the underbanked system has less capacity will reduce your actual [[electrical:solar:sizing#your_reserve_needs|reserve days of power]] to some extent. But during daytime there is //some// solar power coming in and an overpaneled configuration will harvest relatively more power in sub-optimal conditions. The smaller bank will get through Bulk and well into Absorption faster, too. This will help extend the //effective// reserve days of power. | Since the underbanked system has less capacity will reduce your actual [[electrical:solar:sizing#your_reserve_needs|reserve days of power]] to some extent. But during daytime there is //some// solar power coming in and an overpaneled configuration will harvest relatively more power in sub-optimal conditions. The smaller bank will get through Bulk and well into Absorption faster, too. This will help extend the //effective// reserve days of power. |
| | |
| | Further reading: |
| | |
| | * [[electrical:solar:slim_reserve|slim reserves]] |
| |
