User Tools

Site Tools


electrical:solar:pwm_tweaking

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
electrical:solar:pwm_tweaking [2022/10/12 13:33]
frater_secessus [PWM's achilles heel]
electrical:solar:pwm_tweaking [2023/11/19 16:18] (current)
frater_secessus [PWM's achilles heel]
Line 13: Line 13:
 This affects charging in all three [[electrical:12v:charging|charging stages]] but it is devastating in [[electrical:12v:charging#bulk_stage|Bulk]].  Let's do some math to see why.((temperature derating is not considered))   This affects charging in all three [[electrical:12v:charging|charging stages]] but it is devastating in [[electrical:12v:charging#bulk_stage|Bulk]].  Let's do some math to see why.((temperature derating is not considered))  
  
-{{ http://bestsolarpanelforhome.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/57-79-600x600.jpg?200}}Consider the spec sheet for a random 100w panel (right).  100W is made when the panel is run at 17.8v (Vmp). We will use Imp for our math, but the absolute numbers are not important, only the pattern.+{{ http://bestsolarpanelforhome.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/57-79-600x600.jpg?200}}Consider the spec sheet for a random 100w panel (right).  100W is made when the panel is run at 17.8v (Vmp). We will use Imp for our math, but the absolute numbers are not important, only the pattern.  Current will usually be less under normal conditions, but can spike to Isc [[https://diysolarforum.com/threads/why-is-mppt-better-than-pwm.24892/page-4#post-295861|under some conditions]]
  
-17.8v x 5.6A = 99.68w <-- rating under laboratory conditions \\ +17.8v x 5.6A = 100w <-- rating under laboratory conditions((the math doesn't line up perfectly because the specs are rounded)) \\ 
-17.8v x 5.6A = 94.70w <-- MPPT running at 95% efficiency \\+17.8v x 5.6A = 94.70w <-- MPPT running at 95% efficiency 
 + 
 +PWM harvest \\
 14.8v x 5.6A = 82.88w <-- power at a high Absorption voltage, as with flooded lead acid \\ 14.8v x 5.6A = 82.88w <-- power at a high Absorption voltage, as with flooded lead acid \\
 14.4v x 5.6A = 80.64w <-- power at a lower Absorption voltage \\ 14.4v x 5.6A = 80.64w <-- power at a lower Absorption voltage \\
Line 24: Line 26:
 12.7v x 5.6A = 70.61W <-- power at 100% state of charge (SoC) \\ 12.7v x 5.6A = 70.61W <-- power at 100% state of charge (SoC) \\
 12.4v x 5.6A = 69.44W <-- power at 75% state of charge; bulk charging \\ 12.4v x 5.6A = 69.44W <-- power at 75% state of charge; bulk charging \\
-12.1v x 5.6A = 67.76W <-- power at 50% state of charge;  bulk charging+12.1v x 5.6A = 67.76W <-- power at 50% state of charge;  bulk charging \\ 
 +10.0v x 5.6A = 56.00W <-- battery bank accidentally run flat 
  
 This last number shows how far off PWM output can fall when battery voltage (Vbatt) is at its lowest.((The last number is also the source of the "30% boost!!!" claims some MPPT makers make.  Yes, at that point MPPT at 94.69w (after 5% MPPT efficiency penalty) is 40.2% more than PWM's 67.76w but that is when the disparity is the widest.  Most of the time the MPPT charging advantage is lower, perhaps 15%.))  It's also when the battery needs the most current to get out of that deep cycle trough.   This last number shows how far off PWM output can fall when battery voltage (Vbatt) is at its lowest.((The last number is also the source of the "30% boost!!!" claims some MPPT makers make.  Yes, at that point MPPT at 94.69w (after 5% MPPT efficiency penalty) is 40.2% more than PWM's 67.76w but that is when the disparity is the widest.  Most of the time the MPPT charging advantage is lower, perhaps 15%.))  It's also when the battery needs the most current to get out of that deep cycle trough.  
electrical/solar/pwm_tweaking.1665595989.txt.gz · Last modified: 2022/10/12 13:33 by frater_secessus