User Tools

Site Tools


opinion:solar:sizing

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
opinion:solar:sizing [2022/11/08 19:29]
frater_secessus [solar panels]
opinion:solar:sizing [2023/12/26 11:57] (current)
frater_secessus [battery bank]
Line 38: Line 38:
 You will **need somewhat more Ah capacity** You will **need somewhat more Ah capacity**
  
-      * if you have undersized solar +      * if you have undersized solar (lithium banks only) 
-      * you have lead-chemistry battery bank+      * you have lead-chemistry battery bank (50% usable capacity rather than 80% usable) 
 +      * if charging is time-limited and you want maximal harvest from the alternator, shore, or other high-current charging source.  **Example: ** If battery specs say you can constant-charge at [[electrical:12v:battery_capacity|0.2C]] (20A per 100Ah of capacity) then((all other things being equal)) a 100Ah bank could take 20A, 200Ah could take 40A, and 300Ah could take 60A.  
  
 You will need **somewhat less Ah capacity** You will need **somewhat less Ah capacity**
Line 45: Line 46:
     * if you run loads in the daytime instead of at night     * if you run loads in the daytime instead of at night
     * if you have [[electrical:solar:overpaneling|oversized solar]]     * if you have [[electrical:solar:overpaneling|oversized solar]]
 +    * if you drive often and have [[electrical:12v:alternator|altenator charging]]
     * you have lithium-chemistry battery bank((can be ~0.62% the size of the lead bank, due to deeper [[electrical:depth_of_discharge|DoD]].))     * you have lithium-chemistry battery bank((can be ~0.62% the size of the lead bank, due to deeper [[electrical:depth_of_discharge|DoD]].))
  
Line 62: Line 64:
 You will **need somewhat more solar** You will **need somewhat more solar**
  
-    * if you live in an area with relatively little sun, like the American Northwest.+    * if you live in an area with relatively little sun, like the American Northwest, Northern Europe, etc.
     * if you want to run more [[electrical:12v:loads|loads]]     * if you want to run more [[electrical:12v:loads|loads]]
-    * if you live offgrid full time (FT)+    * if you live offgrid full time (FT) or spend long periods [[camping:dispersed|boondocking]]
     * to run things off [[electrical:inverter|inverter]] rather than 12v((due to inversion losses, typically at least 10%))     * to run things off [[electrical:inverter|inverter]] rather than 12v((due to inversion losses, typically at least 10%))
     * to charge a bigger [[electrical:12v:deep_cycle_battery|battery bank]]     * to charge a bigger [[electrical:12v:deep_cycle_battery|battery bank]]
Line 79: Line 81:
     * to charge lithium banks     * to charge lithium banks
  
 +=== calculating real numbers ===
 +
 +
 +**Accurate calculations** would involve:
 +
 +  * the Ah/Wh to be replaced
 +  * the charging efficiency of the battery chemistry (We might ballpark, 99% for Lithium, 80% for FLA, and 90% for AGM.  
 +  * overall efficiency of the solar setup (we can ballpark 85% for MPPT setups, 70% for PWM)
 +  * [[electrical:solar:pvwatts|average insolation sun power available at the time/place]];  in the northern hemisphere full-timers base this on December since it's the lowest-yield month.  For part-timers, it will be the month of lowest insolation you will camp in.
 +  * the contribution of any other charging sources
 +  * minimum charging current requirements, if any.   (we can ballpark 0.2C for AGM and 0.1C for FLA.  Lithium has no minimums)
 +
 +Let's assume a 200Ah AGM bank depleted to 50% SoC, wintering in [[camping:snowbirding:quartzsite|Quartzsite]] with an MPPT-based solar config and flat-mounted panels.  
 +
 +  - 200Ah x 50% = **100Ah to be replaced**
 +  - converting to Wh, 100Ah x nominal 12v = **1200Wh to be replaced**
 +  - battery charging efficiency of 90% means we need **1333.33Wh of actual charging power** to replace the 1200Wh (1200Wh / 0.90) 
 +  - the solar install operates at a 85% efficiency, so we need **1568.63Wh of harvestable sun** power landing on the panels (1333.33Wh / 0.85)
 +  - [[electrical:solar:pvwatts|In December in Quartzsite]], a panel will receive an daily average of **3.08 hours of full sun equivalent**
 +  - So we need **590W of panel** (1568.63Wh / 3.08 hours)
 +
 +In practice you probably won't be drawing your bank to the lowest allowed level each day;  substitute your [[electrical:12v:dailypowerrequirements|actual daily power requirements]].  You may find it easier in the long-term to model this kind of thing in a spreadsheet. 
 +
 +
 +**Note**:  the numbers are for //average// yields, including average seasonal weather.  Individual days may be better or worse.  **If you have non-negotiable power requirements** you may want to oversize your array to account for days of locally-poor harvest. 
 ==== solar charge controller ==== ==== solar charge controller ====
  
Line 104: Line 131:
 [[electrical:solar:charge_controller|Controllers]] are rated by the Amps they can pump out.  A 20A controller can handle up to 20 Amps (about 250w incoming power, depending on battery voltage).   [[electrical:solar:charge_controller|Controllers]] are rated by the Amps they can pump out.  A 20A controller can handle up to 20 Amps (about 250w incoming power, depending on battery voltage).  
  
-A common **rule of thumb for sizing PWM controllers** is to divide [[electrical:solar:panels|panel]] wattage by 10;  300w((rated power)) of panel on a 30A PWM controller. They are cheap enough that a little oversizing is not a big deal, and they need a bit of headroom since they do not throttle incoming current to protect themselves.((they do use PWM switching to throttle current to hold a given setpoint))  +A common **rule of thumb for sizing PWM controllers** is to divide [[electrical:solar:panels|panel]] wattage by 10;  300w((rated power)) of panel on a 30A PWM controller. They are cheap enough that a little oversizing is not a big deal, and they need a bit of headroom since they do not throttle incoming current to protect themselves.((they do use PWM switching to throttle current to hold a given setpoint))   See [[https://mouse.mousetrap.net/blog/2023-06-13-backchannel---comments-on-solar-advice.html#fn:amps|these examples]].
  
 MPPT sizing is less straightforward. These tend to cost 2-3x as much for a given rating as PWM, so oversizing can get $$$.  MPPT have the ability to [[electrical:solar:overpaneling#vs_charge_controller|clip power]] during unusually-high harvest to limit current to their rated capacity.  For this reason they are often **sized to the power the panels make under normal circumstances** rather than the panels' lab rated power.  MPPT sizing is less straightforward. These tend to cost 2-3x as much for a given rating as PWM, so oversizing can get $$$.  MPPT have the ability to [[electrical:solar:overpaneling#vs_charge_controller|clip power]] during unusually-high harvest to limit current to their rated capacity.  For this reason they are often **sized to the power the panels make under normal circumstances** rather than the panels' lab rated power. 
Line 113: Line 140:
   * 300w of panel might make 249w under good conditions.  25A controllers are rare, so they might be put on a 20A mppt controller   * 300w of panel might make 249w under good conditions.  25A controllers are rare, so they might be put on a 20A mppt controller
   * MPPT smaller than 10A are rare, so 100w-150w of panel are usually put on 10A mppt.   * MPPT smaller than 10A are rare, so 100w-150w of panel are usually put on 10A mppt.
 +  * [[https://mouse.mousetrap.net/blog/2023-06-13-backchannel---comments-on-solar-advice.html#sizing-an-mppt-controller|more examples with explanation]]
  
  
opinion/solar/sizing.1667953742.txt.gz · Last modified: 2022/11/08 19:29 by frater_secessus