User Tools
rv:ford_e-series
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
rv:ford_e-series [2022/05/03 14:45] princess_fluffypants [Econoline Weaknesses] |
rv:ford_e-series [2024/01/02 18:11] (current) princess_fluffypants [Visual Identification] |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
| === Engines === | === Engines === | ||
| - | All of the gasoline V-6/8/10 engines offered in the later generations of vans were the " | + | All of the gasoline V-6/8/10 engines offered in the later generations of vans were the " |
| Depending on the year, the Econoline vans were offered with the following engines: | Depending on the year, the Econoline vans were offered with the following engines: | ||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
| * The one you want. Excellent power, good gas milage (20+ mpg). Hard to find in good condition. | * The one you want. Excellent power, good gas milage (20+ mpg). Hard to find in good condition. | ||
| * **6.0L V-8 Diesel** (2004-2010) | * **6.0L V-8 Diesel** (2004-2010) | ||
| - | * [[https:// | + | * [[https:// |
| - | * **6.4L V-8 Diesel** | + | * **6.4L V-8 Diesel** |
| - | * Slightly less terrible, but still [[https:// | + | * Was never put into vans but can be found in pickup trucks and some RVs. Slightly less bad than the 6.0, but still [[https:// |
| === Height === | === Height === | ||
| Line 78: | Line 78: | ||
| Identified by the slightly revised grill with three horizontal bars. | Identified by the slightly revised grill with three horizontal bars. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Beginning in 2005, a new 5-speed transmission was optional behind the 5.4L V-8 and standard behind the 6.8L V-10. | ||
| Avoid the diesel engines in this generation (see the "known issues" | Avoid the diesel engines in this generation (see the "known issues" | ||
| Line 118: | Line 120: | ||
| **Driveline flexibility.** Because these are body-on-frame vehicles (compared to modern uni-body vans), they are much more tolerant of abuse and modification. | **Driveline flexibility.** Because these are body-on-frame vehicles (compared to modern uni-body vans), they are much more tolerant of abuse and modification. | ||
| - | **Towing.** Of this there is no dispute; the Econolines are the vehicle you want if you're towing a heavy trailer. Depending on the engine/ | + | **Towing.** Of this there is no dispute; the Econolines are the vehicle you want if you're towing a heavy trailer. Depending on the engine/ |
| ====Econoline Weaknesses==== | ====Econoline Weaknesses==== | ||
| Line 124: | Line 126: | ||
| **Build Quality.** The vans were built quickly and cheaply, and while the drivetrain and mechanical parts are reliable the interior fit-and-finish leaves a LOT to be desired. Sound deadening/ | **Build Quality.** The vans were built quickly and cheaply, and while the drivetrain and mechanical parts are reliable the interior fit-and-finish leaves a LOT to be desired. Sound deadening/ | ||
| - | **Amenities.** There aren't any. Even things like very basic cruise control are a rarity. None came with backup cameras, forget about blind-spot detection or power/ | + | **Amenities.** There aren't any. Even things like very basic cruise control are a rarity. None came with backup cameras, forget about things like bluetooth or blind-spot detection or power/ |
| The good news is that they' | The good news is that they' | ||
| Line 147: | Line 149: | ||
| The vans are not difficult to steal; a flat-head screwdriver and //maybe// a hammer is all that's needed to punch out a door lock. There' | The vans are not difficult to steal; a flat-head screwdriver and //maybe// a hammer is all that's needed to punch out a door lock. There' | ||
| - | The 4.2L V-6 (used from 1997–2003) is barely able to keep up with traffic, and so under-powered that it's almost dangerous if you have any weight in the van at all. It usually gets //worse// gas mileage than the V-8s, because you're constantly having to floor it just to keep moving. | + | The 4.2L V-6 (used from 1997–2003) is barely able to keep up with traffic, and so under-powered that it's almost dangerous if you have any weight in the van. It usually gets //worse// gas mileage than the V-8s, because you're constantly having to floor it just to keep moving. |
| The 4.6L and 5.4L V-8s are acceptable, and the 6.8L V-10 is quite potent and makes short work of mountain passes and steep inclines. | The 4.6L and 5.4L V-8s are acceptable, and the 6.8L V-10 is quite potent and makes short work of mountain passes and steep inclines. | ||
| - | The 2008 model year (and newer) got //much// better | + | The 2008 model year (and newer) got //much// better brakes than prior years. |
| ===CNG/ | ===CNG/ | ||
| Line 159: | Line 160: | ||
| Unfortunately, | Unfortunately, | ||
| - | Converting the vans back to run on gasoline involves replacing the entire intake, fuel system, engine computer and wiring harness. You'd need almost an entire donor van worth of parts to do it, because | + | Converting the vans back to run on gasoline involves replacing the entire intake, fuel system, engine computer and wiring harness. You'd need almost an entire donor van worth of parts to do it, as trying to buy the parts one by one would be prohibitively expensive. |
| Because of these problems it's generally best to avoid these vans, as they' | Because of these problems it's generally best to avoid these vans, as they' | ||
rv/ford_e-series.1651603554.txt.gz · Last modified: 2022/05/03 14:45 by princess_fluffypants
Page Tools
Except where otherwise noted, content on this wiki is licensed under the following license: CC Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 International
