This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
electrical:solar:output [2023/09/20 15:58] frater_secessus [paradox of big solar] |
electrical:solar:output [2024/11/22 11:44] (current) frater_secessus [where and when] |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
Because the difference between lab and actual conditions is so large, some manufacturers also publish [[https:// | Because the difference between lab and actual conditions is so large, some manufacturers also publish [[https:// | ||
- | In practical terms, it's common to see a maximum of 75% of STC under good conditions, more under great conditions, and much less under poor solar conditions. | + | In practical terms, it's common to see a maximum of 75% of STC under good conditions, more under great conditions, and much less under poor solar conditions. |
+ | |||
+ | ===== where and when ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | The location and season both have profound effects on solar harvest. [[opinion: | ||
+ | |||
+ | For more specific numbers you can estimate solar harvest using [[electrical: | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
===== lack of demand ===== | ===== lack of demand ===== | ||
Line 193: | Line 203: | ||
Pro: | Pro: | ||
- | * +30% daily harvest | + | * optimal tilt will increase |
- | * can be used to increase harvest if roof space is maxxed (cannot add more panel) | + | * can be used to further |
Con: | Con: | ||
Line 223: | Line 233: | ||
[[https:// | [[https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== sensitivity to light spectrum ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Note: these differences exist but are of little practical effect. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== differences in light ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | * direct sunlight is broad-spectrum (a mix of light wavelengths) | ||
+ | * when the sun is near the horizon the available light is more red (longer wavelengths) | ||
+ | * when skies are overcast or otherwise diffused the available light is more blue (shorter wavelengths) | ||
+ | |||
+ | Since the latter point is counterintuitive: | ||
+ | |||
+ | >> at visible wavelengths, | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== differences in panel sensitivity ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{ https:// | ||
+ | Note: | ||
+ | |||
+ | * [redder end] | ||
+ | * CIGS (copper indium gallium selenide) thin-film panels have peak sensitivity around 950nm. | ||
+ | * monocrystalline silicon panels (mono, c-Si) tend to have maximal spectral response around 900nm | ||
+ | * polycrstalline silicon panels (poly, mc-Si, | ||
+ | * GaAs (gallium arsenide) thin-film panels have peak response around 825nm. | ||
+ | * CdTe (Cadmium Telluride) flex panels, the most popular thin-film type, have peak response around 750nm. | ||
+ | * amorphous silicon panels (a-Si, the original noncrystalline panel) - have peak response around 550nm. | ||
+ | * [ bluer end ] | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||