Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision
Previous revision
Next revision
|
Previous revision
|
electrical:solar:output [2025/04/05 18:27] frater_secessus [low ambient temperatures] |
electrical:solar:output [2025/06/18 22:30] (current) frater_secessus [panel temperature] |
===== panel temperature ===== | ===== panel temperature ===== |
| |
Solar panel voltage((and therefore output on MPPT controllers)) varies as cell temperature goes up (in the sun) or down (in very cold ambients). | Cell temperature affects the voltage part of the panel's I/V curve; warmer temps drive voltages down and very cold temperatures drive it up. This is why Voc+20% or similar rules of thumb are used when assessing how much voltage "headroom" the solar charge controller has -- a cold snap could, for example, put a 48Voc rated array over a 50v controller input limit. |
| |
Usually the problem is increased cell temperature which drives down panel output. This is the main reason panels are mounted with an airgap; it allows cooling airflow underneath. | For this reason the array's real-world Vmp is rarely the Vmp given on the lab rating. It doesn't matter much to PWM but you will observe your MPPT finding a Vmp that does not match rated Vmp. And since with MPPT ''Vmp * Imp = Mpp'' lower Vmp means lower harvest. Hence the panel mounting airgap; it allows cooling airflow underneath. |
| |
==== high cell temperatures ==== | ==== high cell temperatures ==== |
| |
| |
Sub-freezing ambients temperatures can push Voc/Vmp above their rated values. If you will use solar in sub-freezing conditions leave plenty of Voc headroom in your solar charge controller spec. +20% margin is traditional. | Sub-freezing temperatures can push Voc/Vmp above their rated values. If you will use solar in sub-freezing conditions leave plenty of Voc headroom in your solar charge controller spec. +20% margin is traditional. |
| |
| |