DRAFT
Words of Wisdom: “With a few basic design considerations, and an alternator design newer than 25 years old, a direct charging system [for LiFePO4] can be safe, effective, and provide significant benefits. - midwestdrifter1)
There is an often-repeated claim that LiFePO4 house banks will always pull monstrous levels of current and destroy alternators if a plain combiner is used instead of a DC-DC charger. This claim is not supported by either theory or empirical testing. The data below provide actual measurements to help people make informed decisions. We will see that current demand by LFP banks follows a known formula rather than the opinions of people on the internet.
This article will focus on current demand by LiFePO4 house banks. Other objections will be addressed at the bottom.
Direct charging is not a good fit for all scenarios. See section below for use cases where other solutions may be required or preferable.
This won't hurt a bit.
I=V/R. This means “current2) is equal to the difference in voltage3) divided by resistance4)”.
For us, this means there are two factors that dictate what a battery bank (lithium or otherwise) will demand of the alternator:
You don't have to fully understand it or get a I=V/R tattoo, but do keep the basic idea in mind as we plunge ahead.
TL;DR: in general we see 0.33C charge acceptance rates at low states of charge, tapering as bank voltage rises. Much like AGM. Across the broad middle of the LFP state of charge acceptance is closer to 0.2C.
This section includes installs that one might find in a typical van:
Since it includes screenshots the data will be for installs documented before Sept 15, 2022.
{There is a full list including installs that fall outside the criteria above. It is updated as I find new information – secessus}
The first thing to look at is how much maximum current the banks are actually drawing in relation to their C-rate (capacity rating).
Remember the warnings tell us the C-rate will be 1.0, which is the max the BMS will allow under most circumstances.
The average max current drawn from the alternator is 0.33C, or 1/3rd of what the warnings predict. This the same C-rate that AGM pulls when cycled to 50% DoD. It might seem counterintuitive but it is a combination of:
There is an outlier that pulls 0.67C at ~10% state of charge.9) That setup has 1awg cables from the starter battery to house battery bank, resulting in extremely low total resistance (9mR). The practical effect of resistance on current will be addressed below, using that owner's experiments for illustration.
Current acceptance does increase with larger bank capacities but this increase can be surprisingly small:
IF you have other things in the network with a much higher resistance than the batteries (such as using the frame as a ground return path), changing the resistance of the battery bank [ie, increasing capacity] can have only a small effect. –MechEngrSGH10)
A second way to look at this is how much of an alternator's output the bank draw per 100Ah of capacity:
On average, direct-charging each 100Ah of LFP consumed ~22% of the alternator's rated output.
There are three failures to date, and none comes from the van-relevant section.
500Ah of LFP direct charged with a 225A alternator. This falls outside the van-relevant window since bank size >300Ah.
Mortons on the Move were able to overheat (not damage) the 225A primary alternator with 500Ah pulling 180A on 1/0 cables between the tow vehicle and travel trailer. This setup might have worked with the theoretical ~400A capacity of the dual-alternator system, but the second alt was not cutting in the way they expected due to Ford's implementation; see the 8 minute mark in this video.
They ended up installing a DC-DC charger (30A Orion-TR) to limit current.
300Ah of LFP (no BMS) direct charged with a 90A alternator. This falls outside the van-relevant window since alternator rating <120A.
Victron damaged a 90A car alternator with 300A of lithium on a bench (no airflow as when driving). They were able to charge the same bank from a 100A-120A11) externally-regulated Balmar alternator. The Balmar observes alternator temperature and regulates current to maintain alternator-safe conditions.
The 60A alternator in RJS's 1977 RV died after approximately 1 year of direct-charging 200Ah of Lithium at rates up to 41A through a manual switch. He indicates the alt was ≥15 years old at the time.
We don't have a lot of control over alternator voltage (diode-based isolators nothwithstanding) but we can affect resistance.
[with lead chemistries] the battery resistance [is] the large and controlling factor, in the case of LFP, its the wiring and the battery resistance is inconsequential. – MechEngrSGH12) (emphasis added)
using a copper cable ground between the starter and the auxiliary battery is actually part of the overcurrent problem. Using a frame ground tends to add a lot of resistance to the network… – MechEngrSGH13)
Direct-charging setups typically only run the POS wire from the battery14) to the relay; NEG return (aka “ground”) is made from the house bank to the vehicle chassis or frame.15)
Steel has much more resistance than copper:
copper (considered 100%), Aluminum is 71%, Brass is 25%, steel is 12-14% (depending on the alloy), lead (solder) is around 12% and 304 stainless steel (what stainless fasteners are made from) is 2.5%16)
…so a chassis NEG return will increase resistance on that leg by something like 8x. The mass of the chassis material is so great no heating will be observed.
Corollary: it may be possible to tweak overall resistance by trying different NEG return points on the chassis.
The owner of the van in the higher-current outlier mentioned above had very low resistance in his wiring. He added resistance to see the practical effect on current drawn by the house bank:17)
We can see that adding resistance makes a noticeable difference in the charge current flowing from alternator to bank.
Thinking back to I=V/R, we should not be surprised that tripling R reduced current to 1/3rd of it's unfettered rate. He provided additional datapoints (table to right).
Although he inserted an actual resistor, any component that increases resistance would have a similar effect:
Let's assume battery resting voltage is 13.0 and alternator voltage is 14.0 and circuit resistance is 20mR (.020R).
Let's add 5m Ohm of resistance:
Anything that reduces the voltage difference (“delta”) between the bank and alternator will reduce current. This delta is the V
in I=V/R
.
Diode-based isolators incur voltage losses, typically around 0.7v.19) This will decrease the difference between battery and apparent alternator voltages, thereby reducing charging current.
It would also reduce final charging voltages, so this might allow vehicles with high chassis voltages like to safely charge LFP. Example: 14.6v → diode-based isolator → 13.9v.
Example: let's assume battery resting voltage is 13.0 and alternator voltage is 14.0 and circuit resistance is 20mR. Diode isolator cause 0.7v loss. We'll do it with a relay first:
Let's add the diode isolator20) to reduce apparent alternator voltage:
When the bank State of Charge (and therefore voltage) is higher the delta and current will be reduced.
Example: we would expect a bank at 12.5v accept more current than one at 13.5. Using the 14.0v alternator output above,
Even if SoC has not increased meaningfully yet other charging sources can drive up apparent bank voltage, thereby reducing the delta and current. This voltage “surge” during charging is the flipside of voltage sag during discharging.
In practice the most common concurrent charging source for an alternator is solar.
Example: Let's assume the same 14.0v alternator output and solar contribution that pushes up Vbatt by 0.3V
Note: this occurs because alternators are voltage regulated while solar charge controllers can output whatever voltage they want internally as long as voltage setpoints at the terminals are exceeded. So two solar controllers will each contribute their max no matter what the other does until the Absorption setpoint is reached. OTOH, current from the voltage-regulated alternator will decrease as other forms of charging push up Vbank and SoC.21)
For these examples we will assume alternator voltage of 14.4v and circuit resistance of 20mR.
Lead batteries have roughly-linear voltage curves. Lithium has a relatively flat curve in the middle 80% and dramatic “knees” at either end (see graph at right). In practice the current acceptance pattern is shaped like the discharge voltage pattern seen to the right.
Word to the wise: if your SoC is ≤20% you may want to allow solar or other charging to bring up voltage a bit before activating alternator charging. At least make sure the vehicle is at cruising speed so the alternator can handle the brief inrush.
For this section we will assume the DC-DC is sized for the moderate currents seen in the middle 80% above (~50A)
As long as we stay away from the bottom knee (lowest 10% of SOC) our patterns are largely the same. Only the currents change.
Current levels with DC-DC will remain the same regardless of bank size.23)
Current levels with combiners will vary with bank size, about 0.33C and tapering (see above).
Breakeven points (the amount of time it takes for each to replace the same Ah/Wh) are easy to assess with DC-DC since their output is table and difficult with combiners since they taper with bank voltage.
But we can try to estimate how much driving it would take to replace 10Ah in a 200Ah bank (going from 50% to 55% SoC, for example:
If the SoC was very low (near cutoff) the combiner would slightly faster, ~7.5 minutes.
[Note: this section errs on the side of methodical plodding in the spirit of “don't eat this mattress” or “do not juggle chainsaws on the top step of this ladder”. For existing setups it can be as simple as starting the engine briefly to see how much current is drawn and going from there. The existing fuse would intervene if the current is harmfully large.]
[Note: this section might seem like overkill. It is intended to walk first-timers through the process in a methodical way. Experienced DIYers will already have internalized this kind of process.]
For measuring charging current you can use the battery's BMS, battery monitor, or clamp meter. If your vehicle has gauges for RPM and voltage you can use those. If not, you might pick up an inexpensive bluetooth OBDii dongle like this to see the values.
Note: this same process also works for testing the size of a DC-DC charger. The difference is SoC doesn't matter since DC-DC output will remain stable for the most part regardless of SoC. If the DC-DC can be derated we would adjust the output current until the alternator was happy at idle (or at higher RPM, whichever suits your use case).
After you have completed the assessment above here are the required parts:
No one is insisting you must to direct-charge your LFP or claiming it is a good fit for all use cases. This article intends to show direct-charging is practical and effective in more use cases than people think.
Let's address some other common objections.
Yes, it can. LFP will charge to ~100% SoC quite smartly at ≥13.8v. Does your alternator put out ≥13.8v? LFP will actually charge to ~100% SoC at voltages as low as 13.6v (3.4Vpc), it just takes longer than most of us drive in one stretch.
Which brings us to the next point: LFP does not need to be fully charged the way lead does. Get as much charge as you need and stop if you want. Or keep going.
If you are driving long enough to reach the desired state of charge (80%, 100%, whatever), you can disable alternator charging if desired.
This info has been moved to the Other Reports tab on the main spreadsheet It includes setups that lack incomplete info, or interesting related setups.