This is an old revision of the document!
These charging sources lend themselves to planning in whole days because they are either ON or OFF, available or unavailable:
Joe Campervan requires 1,000Wh (1kWh) per day. He will fully charge his bank at home before leaving on a 2-day campout.
If he is on shore power at an RV park for one of those days then (from a power perspective) his off-grid is only 1 day, so his total requirements and required capacity is halved. This is true because shore power is effectively limitless; you are not offgrid.
Solar and alternator charging are different.
Alternator charging is a bit more arithmetically complex because it involves both time the engine is running and the bank's current acceptance in Amps from the alternator. Let's assume Joe is driving 1 hour per day and is running a a 30A DC-DC charger to charge his Li bank. The DC-DC will produce ~400Wh of charging daily1). So now the bank only has to cover 1,200Wh on the outing rather than the whole 2,000Wh. (2,000Wh - (2 days x 400Wh charging)). So now he only needs ~117Ah of Li (1,200Wh / 0.8 usable / 12.8v nominal).
; in any given 24hr period the setup will make at least //some// power no matter the conditions or actions of the owner.
Solar harvest is highly variable based on time of year and geographical location.
The decision between larger bank vs smaller bank + field charging is up to Joe. The frequency and duration of his outings will affect the cost/benefit analysis.
If his requirements are modest and outings are short and infrequent he might buy enough Wh to make it through his campouts with zero charging.
If his requirements are heavier or outings longer, more frequent (or even full-time) then it is no longer practical to buy enough Wh to cover the outing; he will need some amount of field charging. If he is overlanding/roadtripping he might lean into alternator charging. If he will be camping in place he might invest more in solar.